every westindian cricket msb has been besides itself to put up rules to guide discussion! a poster cyar do di and deh cyar do dat!.
I mean there mus' be rules but there are several kinds of rules the most important of which is natural rules.
in some european capitals in deep frustration with government directing the lives of all from the minuest farction of life to the large issues started a reaction that seeks to return control of their lives to people.
one step in that direction was the removal of all traffic laws. and what ensued...the opposite of the chaos some people expected. the people drive as usual and accidents ceased to take place, the death toll from vehicular accident took a massive plunge and all is going well.
the people in their natural responsibility, their desires to survive and carry on are using the roads in a manner that saves everyone time, life, safety. using their braisn in the need for all this and more pople use the roads in such ways that avoid all the pitfalls that the official abitrary and expensive structure once caused
thats how I know it will all life. before there was government there was life.....and life always goes in the wy it can to max out its chances of survival. there is no need for official rules only education, truth up to what is know on the current day we are here.
people must be educated with the truth, taught how to function in society according to the truth, making them absolutely functional in nature, independed yet cooperative for collective survival for there is no other way around. the survuila of society ensures the individual. thats it period!
it is in that sens i bserve what I call the hypocrissy on thses msbs especially sissy dot com and 446 under googley and cacabelly!
I started many threads on the issue of race on that site. with respect to Brendon Nash cacabelly even admitted that Indians preferred whites to blacs, and that if Nash and a blac man were tegether after a game and hey were going out for a drin they would jettison the blac and go with Nash for they did not desire the company of the blac.
cacabellu=y admitted that! it is there in their archives. what is also in there is a post i started aboud blac oriented schools in Toronto, Canada, and the 100% opposition to this idea from all on 446. it was incredible that while Indians and Chinese have colonised vast areas of Toronto, effectively turning every official system including the school system in those areas into Indian and Chinese schools, they would deby blac people such an opportunity, even as we do not have the mass concentrations to actually colonised as Indians have done.
so the rules for example that do not allow the use of the N and C words in any circumstance, even in quotations, fall into this band of hypocrissy in my estimation. there is no intent at all on the part of those who moralistically set up rules to change the racis reality among us. that is clear by their own admission and practise, archievd in their own library or all to see.
they ban the words yet refuse to change the reality on the ground. they fight strenuously to maintain the status quo we all know is racist...obviously for they privelidges they have won in it....as opposed to people like me who still ourselves at the bottom of the social ladder.
the N word and the C word and all loaded stigmatising words must be denatured and tossed aside, made harmless by chanign the reality that corespond to the negative meaning of those words. it is not sufficient to ban the words but to denature them in reality, by democratic social practise. but on the parts of those who would ban me for posting a picture of the most beautiful and interesting Rihanna, a westindian girl with whom the whole world is fascinated..or call me lawless because I sought to show up their hypocrsssy by finding ways around the computeruised restriction on the N word in particular, there is no intent, drive, program to help ebnd racism , the exploitation of people of which rcims is a great tool etc.
I never saw on their parts any such motive or action or intent on the parts of googley and cacabelly. they just pass lawas and sit back ensconcd in their sense of superiority, banning left and right as if soemhow that moralises them, makes them social, good and right. I never saw in it Ryan Narine either, the real Burnham of the cricket boards, for he is plain and clear..I am the boss! it goes my way or no way at all!
what always amazes me is the stunning hypocrissy of people, their easy preparedness and actuality of pointing their fingers at others for what they do themselves in greater mesure.
I will end with an example of what ent on Ends msb's cricket pavillion. the talk was about Roti, and a comment by a poster about the high cost of commerical roti in Trinidad! redbaron ppointed out that that was only the commerical product and that roti may had cheaper from different souces. and he also took the oportunity to point out "look who buys it."
in other words what redbaron meant was that blac people bought the expensive roti, that it was prices for them, to exploit them and make Indians rich!
what possible other meaning could redbaron have for those comments. no doubt if broached on this he will ask you if you know what anecdotall speech is. yu see he could have been reporting that meaning as overheard from someone else.
to my way of thinking that from redbaron was the esscen of racism, red and clear, a tgrue source for banning a poster if here ever was on for there is the active thing front of us, printed, clear and recorded in their archives.
ends said nothing! the fastidious jaydee, the arbiter of the english langauge and english logic on Ends board also did not say anything. they are a comuiyt there and may not be disposed to attacking each other for their transgressions...if they are even seen as such when they occur.
I did not know which forum this fit, so I come here!
-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
Titty is an opposite country to me...on the very facts about our home that are the basis for social symbiosis among the ethnics who make up our demography, is hung our sparagmos...our seperation and routine social warfare.
as naipaul pointed out there is a neat and fitting economic seperation between Indians and
africans that would suggest cooperation rather than social warfare.
in our case here Indians do business and for the most part Africans do not. Indians, Africans and their offspring make-up upwards of 90% of the Titty population. if Indiasn do business and they have a ready market from Africans that is not nagtaive thing but an asset to Indians the honing of which ought to be benefical to Africans.
for Indians to keep this market, make it bigger and more certain then the ioneterst of African buyers as it impacts Indian business ought to be of the first consideration of Indians. it is not a question of the nasty response of redbaron, heaping insult on blac people for buying Indian products priced to exploit them. that will only caiuse animosity and reveneg among blacks who aware of their shortcomings will plan on one day returng the favour.
and blac peole are not an incapable people even if at this stage we are now what we should be, but it could workd out to the opposite of the expectations of redbaron and presto we have a very nasty and opposite situation to deal with.
we do not want that..a total waste of time, a reversal of nastiness!
what we want is something of the previous comments..where blac social movements dovetails with that of Indians to make an Indian propserity, that Indians turn back to the benefit of blac people by employing blac people, investing in areas of mutual and general interest so that all benefit.
the glasss is half full or it is half empty..which is it? it seems to me that Titty must generate a positive consciousness of the ethnic inter-relationship that exists..turn inter-relationship into a positive consciousness, of symbiosis and mutual advantage, in the building of Trinidad and Tobago
I would not ban redbaron for his obvious racism anyway. I would put up no rules at all on a cricket msb had I started one. I would simply let it flow, for it to find its own way. the users would tell us what the story actually is
as naipaul pointed out there is a neat and fitting economic seperation between Indians and
africans that would suggest cooperation rather than social warfare.
in our case here Indians do business and for the most part Africans do not. Indians, Africans and their offspring make-up upwards of 90% of the Titty population. if Indiasn do business and they have a ready market from Africans that is not nagtaive thing but an asset to Indians the honing of which ought to be benefical to Africans.
for Indians to keep this market, make it bigger and more certain then the ioneterst of African buyers as it impacts Indian business ought to be of the first consideration of Indians. it is not a question of the nasty response of redbaron, heaping insult on blac people for buying Indian products priced to exploit them. that will only caiuse animosity and reveneg among blacks who aware of their shortcomings will plan on one day returng the favour.
and blac peole are not an incapable people even if at this stage we are now what we should be, but it could workd out to the opposite of the expectations of redbaron and presto we have a very nasty and opposite situation to deal with.
we do not want that..a total waste of time, a reversal of nastiness!
what we want is something of the previous comments..where blac social movements dovetails with that of Indians to make an Indian propserity, that Indians turn back to the benefit of blac people by employing blac people, investing in areas of mutual and general interest so that all benefit.
the glasss is half full or it is half empty..which is it? it seems to me that Titty must generate a positive consciousness of the ethnic inter-relationship that exists..turn inter-relationship into a positive consciousness, of symbiosis and mutual advantage, in the building of Trinidad and Tobago
I would not ban redbaron for his obvious racism anyway. I would put up no rules at all on a cricket msb had I started one. I would simply let it flow, for it to find its own way. the users would tell us what the story actually is
-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
Imagine 446 ban my rass for posting pictures of Rihannas' absolutely gorgeous body!
" Move dem pictures..or I will move dem fuh yu!!!" was googleys vehement directive. imagine the representation of the naked body of a beautiful black woman could could draw such a violent response from a supposed red-blooded male
maybe if Rihanna took a course or skin whitening cream and it worked he might not be so violent towards such a body.
what is wrong with the human body male and female? I mean I like the human body! I have one myself that I never want to lose!
here we go with the same naked human body again! this is a debate I though was forever won, never to be fought again. but here on these boards we have some fanatics who are the inquisition all over again, prepared to enforce their mean religious and prejudiced spirtis all over every who pass the way of westindian cricket boards.
human beings were born naked, and lived naked for very long periods of time. in fact many humans still live mostly naked in their particualr environment, walk barefoot for that is good for the feet. those who walk barefoot do no suffer from the maladies wearing a shoe brings...from corns and caluses to bunions which can be very painful indeed.
this is not to recommend not wearing shoes. shoes must be worn mostly. but in forgetting where we come from we do not take off outr shoes often when we dont have to wear them.
it is the same with our clothes. but I fogot..to go naked is a crime. and it is a sin according to ALL ORGANISED RELIGION TO OBSERVE THE NAKED HUMAN BODY. for if we observe the naked human body we may be tempted to have sex outside of holy wedlock and that is a sin of sins...adultery.
but I have see where people do not wear clothes, among the remaining tribalised people, where the women go about half naked all the time, some with the most bautiful and sexy breats exposed for the world to see, absolutely unseflconsciously, unafraid, as natural and normal in their reality as the rain falls. and for all that there is absolutely no sexual dysfunction among those people. those tribalised people are the most moral anywhere.
there is no sex crime, which is unheard of among them. the tribalised people have their rites and rules, who to and when to get married, responsibilies of husband and father, mothers, the rites of passage for young males and females, circumcision etc. in shiort ribal life featurs who cultural outlooks and practices that address all of life the people live in their specific natural conditions. nakedness is purely functional. and the prurient, lascivious, sexual preadtion prevalent in so-called developed life is nonexistent among the tribess naked, half naked or fully clothed.
why isnt it the same in so-called developed life? that is what those who are ready to ban the pictures of the naked body have to answer.
why is the sexuality socially contiguous with orgainsed religio..all of them... the way it is: sexual exploitation from one end to the next.....rape, prostitution, paedophillia, homosexuality, pornogaphy, sexual hypocrissy from one end to the next...replete with insane rules for no good reason...rules that are bound to produce sexual evil... at all like the prohibition of marriage and sex for catholic priests, that the catholic church refuses to change...rules that lock down and prohibit muslim women from being full social citizens in muslim lands...hindu sanctioned social prejudice that exposes the most deep-seated and virulent prejudices against hundered sof millions of Sudra and muslims in India...
none of of all this nonsense existed in human society before the emergence of organised religion. organised religion, in tandem with administrative bureaus, has extended over humantiy a cover of the most degraded backwardness that has turned good and natural into wicked and evil...and evil and wicked into accepted social practice...like racism, and war, mass murder, conquest and plunder of peoples, stealing their lands and resources, slavery and indenture, genocide.
it is incredible watching the Obama administration...Obama a christian..determined to blow Iran out of the water, to destroy a nation of 80 million people just like america destroyed Iraq, are now destroying Afghanistan and PPakistan.
Obama establishes a set of criteria Iran must comply with. Obama gets what he asked for only the countirs involved are changed. Obama then redraws the criteria, establishes a new that Iran simply cannot meet without surrending its soverignty, its credibility int e world. where does Obama stop if Iran agrees again to his new set of criteria? will Obama stop making demands only when the Iranians says: ok..here is Iran..do with us as you please?
this is they way i see inane organised religion and what it has imposed on humanity. in fact the age of organised religion. 2 thousand years and counting is a dake ages for humanity one of incalcualbe holocaust...one that humanity will not survive for damm sure!
I have posted picures of evil in the world on 446! I can post more! there are famous pictures of evil in the world...like the Vietnamese military official summarily exectuting publicly by hand held gunshot, a suspected vietcong guerilla that i am sure everyone has seen. that would be acceptable picture fare on 446...or on any westindian cricket board.
but what about such pictures makes then acceptable...as they represent horrible evil? why in heavens name would such pictures be acceptable and not pictures of naked women and men?
yu see...things have been turned bass-ackwards!
what is wrong with being excited by a picture of Rihanna! what is wrong with being sexually stimulated? supposed if by accident of birth or otherwise a man or womann could not be, or could no longer be sexually aroused. would that ot be a tragedy! so if one still can be why isnt that celebrated?
why is Tiger woods a pariah because he has a high sex drive! why does everyone have high sex drives anymore as nature surpey impsed such drives on everyone. what has happend to reduce the normally high sex drives for most people? or is that only an impression..that most people still have high drives byt hide thes under the ho;ocaust of human hypocrissy afflicting us all.
maybe the only problem with Tiger is that he got married and is suposed to be faithful to his wife. maybe Tiger is paying a very high price by going contary to his natrural instincts absd drives to play the good boy according to the dictates of american marketing to maxmise his finacial haul from his golfing ability. that ws his choice, his risk! but it does not make his hig sex drive bad or unique.
there is no damm god....certainly no good of the religions. an abomination and hypocrissy they all are, from Judaism and christianity, across to Islam, Hinduism and all the other smaller but no less organised ones. we humans are animals, biological like the rest, must struggle for life like all other forms of life, subject to the laws of nature like all other forms. we must be endowed with high sex drives for that is the only way forms can survive..if they are endowed with prodigious reproductive possibilites that ensures at least some survive in the constant competiton for existence in evolutionary conditions.
people die, are subject to dying on our level as easily as we plop frogs on theirs, invading the paved road in the rainly season, when their reproduction is in full swing, we drive over them and kill them by the ton. and here are predators al over that hunt them. if they did not reproduce prodigiously they would go extinct, in the pressure of survival.
it is the same with humans and all forms. if we did not have sex and amiong the millions of spern in one ejaculae fertlilizes one femal egg there would be no reproduction. to give such an occurance to take place nature endows the ejaculate to have millions of possibilities only a few if which catches.
corn is a fine example. one seed of corn can produces thousands of seeds. and if all corn that is grown reporduces there would not be enough room on planet earth to grown all of it. but nothing of the kind can happen for corn is delicious and nutritious. people eat corn. everything eats corn! every cornfield would suffer a holocaust if it is not protected by the humans who planted it! in fact the only way corn can go on is to ensures it is delicious to humans alowing us to keep it going. it is that or corn is toast. in fact corn may be said to have cultivated us to cultivate it!
but what is sriking is the prpodigious reproductive possibilites in corn or rice, or any fruit..or any form at all including humans. and this appears to mirror the dodgy chances of survival of everything. so that if one is to go on, if a form is to go on it must engage in the activity made by nature to maximise the possibility of successful reproduction. hence in the case of humans, equine, bovine, bovine, ophidians, ornythoids...you name it..high sex drives..battle and fight for sex among males at mating time.
in human society al time is mating time..and now sex does not have to be for reproduction only. but nature has endowed humans with sex drives that cannot be denied....or denied to the ill health of the denying human. to deny natural human sexuality as the powerful naturally embued factor it is to produce all manner of human sexual and emotiolal dysfucntion...a tsunami of which is now upon us as the old way systematic fades, done, exhausted... and a new way of social organisation must be found to make full use of the current day successfully so that humnaity may go on. if not we will blow ourselves up which sems the likely eventually given the way we have trully screrwed ourselves whith these organised religions we have imposed on ourselves, that makes us disparage the very things evolevd by nature relevant to our survival
there is nothing wrong with viewing the naked human body, to be aroused by it, to love someone, many ones, to be with them, fool around, enjoy their bodies as well as your on. there was a ime when humans had sex like all the rest of the animal kingdom...on the go, immediately, in front to evrryone else. we have changed over tme but bnot for the better. public sex is goin backwards but sexuality as we now practice it, hem it in, regulate it...is awful and ill, sick and it produces illness all over the world.
it is time for a new liberating look. people are taking it upon theemslevs to live as they see fit, as the can do so successfully. thats the way to go...the way it always must...how life can be successfully carried on on the day. this has nothing to do with the doctrinal dictates of of any damm organised religion, pusihgn its own partisan point of view bsically frelevant to the survial of its own hierarchy, its own priesthood at rhe espense of all those who belive in what the church says. those beioever end up payng for the chuch as their priest live sweetly in great conditions as oppsoed to the living conditions of those who pay.
that is really the point of organised religion...the maintainance of an elite telling the ordinary people what to do, how to live including paying them the priest for the priviledge of telling them the lies. y
ou see god told them to lie to their people so that they could accumulate riches did he not?
and in the process they have told us how to have sex, how to pray, how to masturbate..never! how to view the human body..as wicked...opposed to the day before when we saw it as good, neat sexy! what do do with our sex drive,,,wicked and evvil that we should want to have sex...supress it!
and what about the trauma of supression and when it comes back to haunt us especially when we break the code because the drive was to great to deny? sinful! purify yourself by intense flagellation, bruise and scour the flesh for it is evil and wicked, the devil tempting the weak and evil...original sin...we are born with the damm thing.
and of course when you are seen to be mad for these insane practices they cart you away to be tortued in some asylum...while the priest who taught you is home and warm, fine and well fed on your alms in the collection plate, your tithes, from the taxes the state says the church must not pay...a fine tandem the chruch and state.
and all that leads to googley and so many others in hate of the human body, who have locked themslevs down against their natural nature, generally unhappy in that lockdown, with one woman, year after year, committed even if it does not work because that is the way they have beeb taught...opposed to nature which determnines if anything the exact opposite of all that crap.
these ar the ones whio say this is a family site and we tolerate no such pictures, even if accorinding to my own profile posting away there for years I intended no such thing as prurience when I posted those pictures, but to start a debate on Rihannas astounding sexuailty...the exceedingly strong impression she impacted on the world...that is as fascinated as I am by the magnificent, blooming, fecund, sexual radiance of the woman, a lil' girl from the westindies..our westindies.
organised religion made th human body and view it a wicked and sinful thing. a long battle has been fought against such nonses and partly won. to date. it appears there is still a long way to go to regain human natural appreciation of the human body, especially those that typify uniquely, magnificently, expressions of general human qualities.
to hell with 446..with googly and cacabelly, 2 elitist, spiritually , conservative and limited fellows, who are quite unaware of how ridiculous and anarchronistic they really are
" Move dem pictures..or I will move dem fuh yu!!!" was googleys vehement directive. imagine the representation of the naked body of a beautiful black woman could could draw such a violent response from a supposed red-blooded male
maybe if Rihanna took a course or skin whitening cream and it worked he might not be so violent towards such a body.
what is wrong with the human body male and female? I mean I like the human body! I have one myself that I never want to lose!
here we go with the same naked human body again! this is a debate I though was forever won, never to be fought again. but here on these boards we have some fanatics who are the inquisition all over again, prepared to enforce their mean religious and prejudiced spirtis all over every who pass the way of westindian cricket boards.
human beings were born naked, and lived naked for very long periods of time. in fact many humans still live mostly naked in their particualr environment, walk barefoot for that is good for the feet. those who walk barefoot do no suffer from the maladies wearing a shoe brings...from corns and caluses to bunions which can be very painful indeed.
this is not to recommend not wearing shoes. shoes must be worn mostly. but in forgetting where we come from we do not take off outr shoes often when we dont have to wear them.
it is the same with our clothes. but I fogot..to go naked is a crime. and it is a sin according to ALL ORGANISED RELIGION TO OBSERVE THE NAKED HUMAN BODY. for if we observe the naked human body we may be tempted to have sex outside of holy wedlock and that is a sin of sins...adultery.
but I have see where people do not wear clothes, among the remaining tribalised people, where the women go about half naked all the time, some with the most bautiful and sexy breats exposed for the world to see, absolutely unseflconsciously, unafraid, as natural and normal in their reality as the rain falls. and for all that there is absolutely no sexual dysfunction among those people. those tribalised people are the most moral anywhere.
there is no sex crime, which is unheard of among them. the tribalised people have their rites and rules, who to and when to get married, responsibilies of husband and father, mothers, the rites of passage for young males and females, circumcision etc. in shiort ribal life featurs who cultural outlooks and practices that address all of life the people live in their specific natural conditions. nakedness is purely functional. and the prurient, lascivious, sexual preadtion prevalent in so-called developed life is nonexistent among the tribess naked, half naked or fully clothed.
why isnt it the same in so-called developed life? that is what those who are ready to ban the pictures of the naked body have to answer.
why is the sexuality socially contiguous with orgainsed religio..all of them... the way it is: sexual exploitation from one end to the next.....rape, prostitution, paedophillia, homosexuality, pornogaphy, sexual hypocrissy from one end to the next...replete with insane rules for no good reason...rules that are bound to produce sexual evil... at all like the prohibition of marriage and sex for catholic priests, that the catholic church refuses to change...rules that lock down and prohibit muslim women from being full social citizens in muslim lands...hindu sanctioned social prejudice that exposes the most deep-seated and virulent prejudices against hundered sof millions of Sudra and muslims in India...
none of of all this nonsense existed in human society before the emergence of organised religion. organised religion, in tandem with administrative bureaus, has extended over humantiy a cover of the most degraded backwardness that has turned good and natural into wicked and evil...and evil and wicked into accepted social practice...like racism, and war, mass murder, conquest and plunder of peoples, stealing their lands and resources, slavery and indenture, genocide.
it is incredible watching the Obama administration...Obama a christian..determined to blow Iran out of the water, to destroy a nation of 80 million people just like america destroyed Iraq, are now destroying Afghanistan and PPakistan.
Obama establishes a set of criteria Iran must comply with. Obama gets what he asked for only the countirs involved are changed. Obama then redraws the criteria, establishes a new that Iran simply cannot meet without surrending its soverignty, its credibility int e world. where does Obama stop if Iran agrees again to his new set of criteria? will Obama stop making demands only when the Iranians says: ok..here is Iran..do with us as you please?
this is they way i see inane organised religion and what it has imposed on humanity. in fact the age of organised religion. 2 thousand years and counting is a dake ages for humanity one of incalcualbe holocaust...one that humanity will not survive for damm sure!
I have posted picures of evil in the world on 446! I can post more! there are famous pictures of evil in the world...like the Vietnamese military official summarily exectuting publicly by hand held gunshot, a suspected vietcong guerilla that i am sure everyone has seen. that would be acceptable picture fare on 446...or on any westindian cricket board.
but what about such pictures makes then acceptable...as they represent horrible evil? why in heavens name would such pictures be acceptable and not pictures of naked women and men?
yu see...things have been turned bass-ackwards!
what is wrong with being excited by a picture of Rihanna! what is wrong with being sexually stimulated? supposed if by accident of birth or otherwise a man or womann could not be, or could no longer be sexually aroused. would that ot be a tragedy! so if one still can be why isnt that celebrated?
why is Tiger woods a pariah because he has a high sex drive! why does everyone have high sex drives anymore as nature surpey impsed such drives on everyone. what has happend to reduce the normally high sex drives for most people? or is that only an impression..that most people still have high drives byt hide thes under the ho;ocaust of human hypocrissy afflicting us all.
maybe the only problem with Tiger is that he got married and is suposed to be faithful to his wife. maybe Tiger is paying a very high price by going contary to his natrural instincts absd drives to play the good boy according to the dictates of american marketing to maxmise his finacial haul from his golfing ability. that ws his choice, his risk! but it does not make his hig sex drive bad or unique.
there is no damm god....certainly no good of the religions. an abomination and hypocrissy they all are, from Judaism and christianity, across to Islam, Hinduism and all the other smaller but no less organised ones. we humans are animals, biological like the rest, must struggle for life like all other forms of life, subject to the laws of nature like all other forms. we must be endowed with high sex drives for that is the only way forms can survive..if they are endowed with prodigious reproductive possibilites that ensures at least some survive in the constant competiton for existence in evolutionary conditions.
people die, are subject to dying on our level as easily as we plop frogs on theirs, invading the paved road in the rainly season, when their reproduction is in full swing, we drive over them and kill them by the ton. and here are predators al over that hunt them. if they did not reproduce prodigiously they would go extinct, in the pressure of survival.
it is the same with humans and all forms. if we did not have sex and amiong the millions of spern in one ejaculae fertlilizes one femal egg there would be no reproduction. to give such an occurance to take place nature endows the ejaculate to have millions of possibilities only a few if which catches.
corn is a fine example. one seed of corn can produces thousands of seeds. and if all corn that is grown reporduces there would not be enough room on planet earth to grown all of it. but nothing of the kind can happen for corn is delicious and nutritious. people eat corn. everything eats corn! every cornfield would suffer a holocaust if it is not protected by the humans who planted it! in fact the only way corn can go on is to ensures it is delicious to humans alowing us to keep it going. it is that or corn is toast. in fact corn may be said to have cultivated us to cultivate it!
but what is sriking is the prpodigious reproductive possibilites in corn or rice, or any fruit..or any form at all including humans. and this appears to mirror the dodgy chances of survival of everything. so that if one is to go on, if a form is to go on it must engage in the activity made by nature to maximise the possibility of successful reproduction. hence in the case of humans, equine, bovine, bovine, ophidians, ornythoids...you name it..high sex drives..battle and fight for sex among males at mating time.
in human society al time is mating time..and now sex does not have to be for reproduction only. but nature has endowed humans with sex drives that cannot be denied....or denied to the ill health of the denying human. to deny natural human sexuality as the powerful naturally embued factor it is to produce all manner of human sexual and emotiolal dysfucntion...a tsunami of which is now upon us as the old way systematic fades, done, exhausted... and a new way of social organisation must be found to make full use of the current day successfully so that humnaity may go on. if not we will blow ourselves up which sems the likely eventually given the way we have trully screrwed ourselves whith these organised religions we have imposed on ourselves, that makes us disparage the very things evolevd by nature relevant to our survival
there is nothing wrong with viewing the naked human body, to be aroused by it, to love someone, many ones, to be with them, fool around, enjoy their bodies as well as your on. there was a ime when humans had sex like all the rest of the animal kingdom...on the go, immediately, in front to evrryone else. we have changed over tme but bnot for the better. public sex is goin backwards but sexuality as we now practice it, hem it in, regulate it...is awful and ill, sick and it produces illness all over the world.
it is time for a new liberating look. people are taking it upon theemslevs to live as they see fit, as the can do so successfully. thats the way to go...the way it always must...how life can be successfully carried on on the day. this has nothing to do with the doctrinal dictates of of any damm organised religion, pusihgn its own partisan point of view bsically frelevant to the survial of its own hierarchy, its own priesthood at rhe espense of all those who belive in what the church says. those beioever end up payng for the chuch as their priest live sweetly in great conditions as oppsoed to the living conditions of those who pay.
that is really the point of organised religion...the maintainance of an elite telling the ordinary people what to do, how to live including paying them the priest for the priviledge of telling them the lies. y
ou see god told them to lie to their people so that they could accumulate riches did he not?
and in the process they have told us how to have sex, how to pray, how to masturbate..never! how to view the human body..as wicked...opposed to the day before when we saw it as good, neat sexy! what do do with our sex drive,,,wicked and evvil that we should want to have sex...supress it!
and what about the trauma of supression and when it comes back to haunt us especially when we break the code because the drive was to great to deny? sinful! purify yourself by intense flagellation, bruise and scour the flesh for it is evil and wicked, the devil tempting the weak and evil...original sin...we are born with the damm thing.
and of course when you are seen to be mad for these insane practices they cart you away to be tortued in some asylum...while the priest who taught you is home and warm, fine and well fed on your alms in the collection plate, your tithes, from the taxes the state says the church must not pay...a fine tandem the chruch and state.
and all that leads to googley and so many others in hate of the human body, who have locked themslevs down against their natural nature, generally unhappy in that lockdown, with one woman, year after year, committed even if it does not work because that is the way they have beeb taught...opposed to nature which determnines if anything the exact opposite of all that crap.
these ar the ones whio say this is a family site and we tolerate no such pictures, even if accorinding to my own profile posting away there for years I intended no such thing as prurience when I posted those pictures, but to start a debate on Rihannas astounding sexuailty...the exceedingly strong impression she impacted on the world...that is as fascinated as I am by the magnificent, blooming, fecund, sexual radiance of the woman, a lil' girl from the westindies..our westindies.
organised religion made th human body and view it a wicked and sinful thing. a long battle has been fought against such nonses and partly won. to date. it appears there is still a long way to go to regain human natural appreciation of the human body, especially those that typify uniquely, magnificently, expressions of general human qualities.
to hell with 446..with googly and cacabelly, 2 elitist, spiritually , conservative and limited fellows, who are quite unaware of how ridiculous and anarchronistic they really are