I dont see anywhere, any kind of achievement or cred dat establishes skansh as anything but an obdurate batsman.
wat has given us the idea that skansh would make a good captain?
enquiring minds wud like to know!
Mikesiva Underline Sknash As Possible Captain...Why?
-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
on wat basis is knash being considered as captaincy material?
I dont see anywhere, any kind of achievement or cred dat establishes skansh as anything but an obdurate batsman.
wat has given us the idea that skansh would make a good captain?
enquiring minds wud like to know!
I dont see anywhere, any kind of achievement or cred dat establishes skansh as anything but an obdurate batsman.
wat has given us the idea that skansh would make a good captain?
enquiring minds wud like to know!
-
mikesiva
- Posts: 19320
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
- Contact:
1) Nash earns his place in the Test side on merit....
2) He's one of the few experienced players to do so, who actually want to take on a leadership role, the other being probably Sarwan.
3) He has a personally disciplined approach to his game.
4) He's a better choice than Sammy!
2) He's one of the few experienced players to do so, who actually want to take on a leadership role, the other being probably Sarwan.
3) He has a personally disciplined approach to his game.
4) He's a better choice than Sammy!
-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
1, 3 and 4 seem true to me! 2 raise some questions.mikesiva wrote:1) Nash earns his place in the Test side on merit....
2) He's one of the few experienced players to do so, who actually want to take on a leadership role, the other being probably Sarwan.
3) He has a personally disciplined approach to his game.
4) He's a better choice than Sammy!
but for me skansh is a sort of guest, a tourist who qualifies to play, is good in this current mix of poor quality players so he plays.
he is out of the question as captain as willingness to lead is not basic leadership criteria as far as I am concerned.
we have people available, westindian born, commited to the westindies who have led things and from that we can judge what we may get from them.
we have nutten of the kind from sknash to compare him
l
so et the tourist play he play and leave when his done. while in the interim we use the leadership slots to train soemone who is westindian, will be here for us an will do a job for the region.
-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
yu cyar leave skansh alone eh. wat is it with yu an' dat guy!?Googley wrote:Maps, between Clappo Scammy and Nash, who would you rather see captain WI side?
I wish to see neither as westindies captain. skansh is no great shakes as antyhing at all. he is not a great player, he is not a great leader..nothing at all.
in normal times he wud not have even smelt the jamaica team far less kerry water an' towels for the westindies team.
I mean if he was as good as alexander was for example, or Hendricks. and if he was dat good the Oz wud have kept him.
man I cud see all the noise is this guy was soemthing above the ordinary but he is not. and he wont stay. so wat do I care!