Windwards vs Guyana

West Indies cricket discussions
DMan
Posts: 4117
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 11:02 am

Unread post

Windwards winning this game. Not a huge score to chase.
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

can Guyana defend 181?
User avatar
mikesiva
Posts: 19320
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
Contact:

Unread post

GUYvWIN: Guyana bowling: Crandon: 1-0-4-0; Bishoo: 1-0-6-0; Beaton: 1-0-2-0; Permaul: 1-1-0-0. Smith 6, James 6 Windwards 12-0

Is that stumps?
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

mikesiva wrote:GUYvWIN: Guyana bowling: Crandon: 1-0-4-0; Bishoo: 1-0-6-0; Beaton: 1-0-2-0; Permaul: 1-1-0-0. Smith 6, James 6 Windwards 12-0

Is that stumps?
yes that is it for today!

Guyana 138 and 294.Windwards 252 and 12-0. On Monday, Windwards have all day to get 169 more for victory.Guyana need all 10 wickets
User avatar
mikesiva
Posts: 19320
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
Contact:

Unread post

James is out to Barnwell for 12. This could get interesting. :)
User avatar
mikesiva
Posts: 19320
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
Contact:

Unread post

The yam licker gets a half century. If johnson charles can get a 50 why cant powell. :lol:
User avatar
mikesiva
Posts: 19320
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
Contact:

Unread post

The yam licker is Finally out to bishoo for 66.
mapoui
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Unread post

mikesiva wrote:The yam licker is Finally out to bishoo for 66.

the yam licker on my fantasy side..fletcher too. and permaul
mapoui
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Unread post

an' I not changing my side! :D :D :D
Brallitly
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2024 8:13 am

Unread post

Monitor Closely 2 carbamazepine will decrease the level or effect of ketamine by affecting hepatic enzyme CYP2B6 metabolism priligy dapoxetine 30mg None of the patients diagnosed with proximal tubal occlusion by HSG in our study group underwent repeat HSG or laparoscopy for confirmation, but it is possible that they might not truly have had tubal occlusion
Post Reply