Mr Ramnarine refers $150,000 to lawyers
- socafighter
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:16 pm
MEDIA RELEASE
WIPA denies that it has stymied, delayed or breached any Agreements.
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago – 25th August, 2010: WIPA replies to the WICB’s Release of 24th August 2010 as follows:
There was no timeframe set out in the New York Agreement (NYA) for the Special Arbitrations as articulated by the WICB.
With regards to the CBA/MOU negotiations it was agreed by representatives of both parties following meetings on October 14th 2009 and November 26th 2009 that completion of this process would be impossible by December 31st 2009. WIPA forwarded its position in writing on 7th December 2009 in respect of the proposed CBA/MOU and has had no response from the WICB.
Contrary to the WICB’s assertion that they have adhered to all the terms of the NYA, the issue of Players Rankings has not been agreed. Also the procedure agreed regarding the matter of injury payments has not been followed and these matters still remain unresolved.
The ICC/ FICA proposal as contained in its document to WIPA indicates under the heading “Degree of Authority”: ‘that the scope of authority vested on ICC/FICA is only to discuss and recommend joint proposals, where possible. No power to bind the WICB or WIPA”.
Clearly the process outlined above by the ICC and FICA requires the two parties to come to an agreement whereas the Special Arbitration requires the presentation of the arguments of the two parties and culminates in a ruling by the Arbitration Panel which is binding.
The WICB in its release further stated that it “paid the legal fees as agreed and has paid the US $450,000.00 of which Mr. Ramnarine received US$ 150,000.00”
Mr. Dinanath Ramnarine denies that he ever received any such payment and has referred the matter to his Attorneys- at- Law.
WIPA denies that it has stymied, delayed or breached any Agreements.
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago – 25th August, 2010: WIPA replies to the WICB’s Release of 24th August 2010 as follows:
There was no timeframe set out in the New York Agreement (NYA) for the Special Arbitrations as articulated by the WICB.
With regards to the CBA/MOU negotiations it was agreed by representatives of both parties following meetings on October 14th 2009 and November 26th 2009 that completion of this process would be impossible by December 31st 2009. WIPA forwarded its position in writing on 7th December 2009 in respect of the proposed CBA/MOU and has had no response from the WICB.
Contrary to the WICB’s assertion that they have adhered to all the terms of the NYA, the issue of Players Rankings has not been agreed. Also the procedure agreed regarding the matter of injury payments has not been followed and these matters still remain unresolved.
The ICC/ FICA proposal as contained in its document to WIPA indicates under the heading “Degree of Authority”: ‘that the scope of authority vested on ICC/FICA is only to discuss and recommend joint proposals, where possible. No power to bind the WICB or WIPA”.
Clearly the process outlined above by the ICC and FICA requires the two parties to come to an agreement whereas the Special Arbitration requires the presentation of the arguments of the two parties and culminates in a ruling by the Arbitration Panel which is binding.
The WICB in its release further stated that it “paid the legal fees as agreed and has paid the US $450,000.00 of which Mr. Ramnarine received US$ 150,000.00”
Mr. Dinanath Ramnarine denies that he ever received any such payment and has referred the matter to his Attorneys- at- Law.
Last edited by socafighter on Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- socafighter
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:16 pm
I hope WICB has a document with his name on it..... 
Khan could be the fall guy in this one..

Khan could be the fall guy in this one..
- socafighter
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 5:16 pm
Lets see how this on ends..... Who checks press releases for WICB ,they have a lawyer on staff.
Amazing group of peeps here.
Amazing group of peeps here.

- BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
WICB is struggling to stay afloat. The way em operate like a bush shop .... 
did you see SA players and board just singed an good agreement without any noise?

did you see SA players and board just singed an good agreement without any noise?
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
dat is the kind of money dem felleas and dem playing around with?
legal fees caots 450k usd for legal fees?
who are those lawyers making all dat money?
and if the wicb paying all that money and all that time and attention to law suits...how can deh do a job fuh westindies cricket?
legal fees caots 450k usd for legal fees?
who are those lawyers making all dat money?
and if the wicb paying all that money and all that time and attention to law suits...how can deh do a job fuh westindies cricket?
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
dat is the kind of money dem fellas and dem playing around with?
450k usd for legal fees?
who are those lawyers making all dat money?
and if the wicb paying all that money and all that time and attention to law suits...how can deh do a job fuh westindies cricket?
450k usd for legal fees?
who are those lawyers making all dat money?
and if the wicb paying all that money and all that time and attention to law suits...how can deh do a job fuh westindies cricket?
Last edited by mapoui on Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.