be careful mike! yu dealing with the star poster there!The directors of the COTR would do well to remember this line....
LOL at that skunt Ian Chappell
-
AFRO
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
There's a difference between youngsters doing well at REGIONAL and A-TEAM level like the likes of Brathwaite did and just playing at u19 level like then indian kids!!.. so please WHEEL AND COME AGAIN!!mikesiva wrote: The directors of the COTR would do well to remember this line....
.-
Arnik
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm
I might well ask you the same question because in your little world ALL coaches are bad, wicked folks bent on detroying everything and everyone.mapoui wrote:what the hell are you talking about?
do yu understand whats going orn?
Having pointed out Flower's good work with England you changing your tune.mapoui wrote:the english apparently had adjusted after Duncan Fletehcer r and the bruhaha with Pietersen and Moores.
Flower is working fine getting along by not imposing himself as Fletcher did and Moores started doing which pissed off Pietersen.
KP is something of a loose cannon and you have no idea what "pissed" Pietersen off - it does not take much to piss Pietersen off. So your attempt to say that the coach is to blame is quite ridiculous.
Look, there are many others besides Flower. It was your contention that ALL head coaches are bad and wicked.mapoui wrote:but the flower phenomena is one in a sea of crap with head coaching. and flower will no be there forever.
Nice try but I am not sure if you really know what caused the emergence of Kanhai etc.mapoui' wrote: by the time of Kanhai and Butcher Walcott was a coach but it is how Walcott coached is the key. Walcott appeared hardly ever to be telling players what to do. he let them flow and intervened only when he felt he had to..if ever.
-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
man..wat are yu reading..what I say or what you think I say?
teh power relation I said: concentrate all the power in a coaches hand and you creat a sitaion ofr abuse of all sorts and a defeat of the purpose of coachng and the purpose of the team..
power corruts and absolute power corrupts absoluely.
I also pointed out that such concentratin of power in fewer hands is a procductof the general concentraion of power in the world where from the top down we see the same phenomena..monopoly.
monopoly has a plan for all that goes on in th world then that reflects its own nature..concentration of power, monopoly, dictatorship. we are seeing less and less democracy in the world when what we need is more...ful transparency in the way all thngs ard done...greater participation in the process of society and decision-making
thats what i have been saying. if at the moment flower is an exception he is just one man representing a certain performance that became possible after the failure of 2 monoploy types Fletcher and Mooores.
but no matter how successful flower is he cant change the underlying reality of a power relation that eliminates democracy and concentrates power in a pair of hands. that ultmately defeats every conceivable decent goal we can have in plating the game of cricket.
monoply is the tool of a concentrated dictatoral power. democrcy..the opposite..is what we need
teh power relation I said: concentrate all the power in a coaches hand and you creat a sitaion ofr abuse of all sorts and a defeat of the purpose of coachng and the purpose of the team..
power corruts and absolute power corrupts absoluely.
I also pointed out that such concentratin of power in fewer hands is a procductof the general concentraion of power in the world where from the top down we see the same phenomena..monopoly.
monopoly has a plan for all that goes on in th world then that reflects its own nature..concentration of power, monopoly, dictatorship. we are seeing less and less democracy in the world when what we need is more...ful transparency in the way all thngs ard done...greater participation in the process of society and decision-making
thats what i have been saying. if at the moment flower is an exception he is just one man representing a certain performance that became possible after the failure of 2 monoploy types Fletcher and Mooores.
but no matter how successful flower is he cant change the underlying reality of a power relation that eliminates democracy and concentrates power in a pair of hands. that ultmately defeats every conceivable decent goal we can have in plating the game of cricket.
monoply is the tool of a concentrated dictatoral power. democrcy..the opposite..is what we need