WILL THE REAL KIWI STAND UP
DEH ARE.....STANDING UP!
CHECK THE MAGNITUDE OF A CUTARSE WAITING FUH DE WEST INDIES COMING UP
But Wait! Weh Watliss AFRO! Allyuh See The Kiwi?
-
AFRO
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
LOL di canadian skunt still banging di Kiwi drum?
THEY DREW IN AUSTRALIA before we played them...a result everyone was raving about, but what happened? WE BEAT DOWN DEM RASS EASY!!!..
Keep cheerleading fi dem though..when we get another result against them your embarrassment will be HIGHLIGHTED even more!!
The fact is without Swann Mike's team just don't have that magic to break partnerships, thats why NZ have been allowed to get away with murder, when we played them Narine spun rings around dem rass and will do so again in November!!
.
THEY DREW IN AUSTRALIA before we played them...a result everyone was raving about, but what happened? WE BEAT DOWN DEM RASS EASY!!!..
Keep cheerleading fi dem though..when we get another result against them your embarrassment will be HIGHLIGHTED even more!!
The fact is without Swann Mike's team just don't have that magic to break partnerships, thats why NZ have been allowed to get away with murder, when we played them Narine spun rings around dem rass and will do so again in November!!
.-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
di'ze right..Swannie not deh. so like Sobers with bat ball and in the field if no swannie the pommies lose
nonsense!
swan is just one man...and Panesar is pretty good save the kiwi did not let him settle in this match, attacked him severely and beat him all over the place.
the loss of pietersen seems more of a problem than swan.
the whole freaking england bowling attack there with them...if any diminution because of swann's absence it could only be a few % points. Panesar had been taking wikects by the bushel in India....far more than swann
but where the Kiwi are scoring england batsmen cant score..not even when pietersen was there. same ground and wicket, same short boundaries, same sunshine ..everthing.
you have to give jack his jacket impse AFRO! the Kiwi are playing well..better than west indies. they have good young players coming up. they now have a better captain.
I am highlighting the Kiwi to expose west indies skunt, stupid gibbo, radford, hunter, skunt buttsy...all ah dem. by the end of this year or by next west indian season west indies will be ahead only of Zim and the associates
nonsense!
swan is just one man...and Panesar is pretty good save the kiwi did not let him settle in this match, attacked him severely and beat him all over the place.
the loss of pietersen seems more of a problem than swan.
the whole freaking england bowling attack there with them...if any diminution because of swann's absence it could only be a few % points. Panesar had been taking wikects by the bushel in India....far more than swann
but where the Kiwi are scoring england batsmen cant score..not even when pietersen was there. same ground and wicket, same short boundaries, same sunshine ..everthing.
you have to give jack his jacket impse AFRO! the Kiwi are playing well..better than west indies. they have good young players coming up. they now have a better captain.
I am highlighting the Kiwi to expose west indies skunt, stupid gibbo, radford, hunter, skunt buttsy...all ah dem. by the end of this year or by next west indian season west indies will be ahead only of Zim and the associates
-
AFRO
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
What fecking "youngsters" you talking about? 
FULTRON IS 34
MARTIN IS 32
you call dem "young"?
furthermore Swann is in di top five bowler in di rankings, di man has been a hero for di poms, and it's HIM who usually drives that attack and gets it going, but he's not there, Monty always been an up and down bowler, when di conditions don't suit him he's useless, thats why he was dropped for Swann in the first place .
Look Kiwi's have done well, and if they win the series then good for them, but the fact is we beat them easily when we last met, so why shouldn't we be confident of going over there and doing well? we scored over 300 in an innings in ALL THREE of our tests in england, those conditions are much tougher than what it will be like in NZ so i'm not worried at all .
FULTRON IS 34
MARTIN IS 32
you call dem "young"?
furthermore Swann is in di top five bowler in di rankings, di man has been a hero for di poms, and it's HIM who usually drives that attack and gets it going, but he's not there, Monty always been an up and down bowler, when di conditions don't suit him he's useless, thats why he was dropped for Swann in the first place
.Look Kiwi's have done well, and if they win the series then good for them, but the fact is we beat them easily when we last met, so why shouldn't we be confident of going over there and doing well? we scored over 300 in an innings in ALL THREE of our tests in england, those conditions are much tougher than what it will be like in NZ so i'm not worried at all
.-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
Look Kiwi's have done well, and if they win the series then good for them, but the fact is we beat them easily when we last met, so why shouldn't we be confident of going over there and doing well?
lets do it this way then:
say you worked for a bookie and have clients money to bet on that um-coming series..and you job depended on the outcome of your choice...would you bet on west indies led by Sammy and coached by big skunt Bibbo ,after his perfomance in Bang and Oz away?
no sir. you would have to consider carefully what had happened in the meantime in the development of both sides..for they would not, cannot be what the were at their last meeting. that is not the way things work.
west indies average age is not good. we have 2 young players..Bravo and Powell...a third is Gabriel Plays.
all the rest are up there starting with shive at almost 39-40. gayle 33, samuels 32, shillingford 27, Best 32..Roach younger..23? but well played out already...Rampaul 28, Deo 28-29..Edwrads 27-28, Sammy 28, Ramdin 28..close to 30 average
-
AFRO
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
A lot of things could happen between now and November maps!!..NZ are gonna be playing England again IN ENGLAND, i can imagine the english will want to put the record straight, do you think NZ can win in England?mapoui wrote:
lets do it this way then:
say you worked for a bookie and have clients money to bet on that um-coming series..and you job depended on the outcome of your choice...would you bet on west indies led by Sammy and coached by big skunt Bibbo ,after his perfomance in Bang and Oz away?
no sir. you would have to consider carefully what had happened in the meantime in the development of both sides..for they would not, cannot be what the were at their last meeting. that is not the way things work.
i very much doubt it, so their confidence could be damaged if England buss dem rass bad, meanwhile we will be playing Pak at home, if we win that series (and i think we can) then that would be FOUR TEST SERIES in a row won!! , our confidence will be SKY HIGH going to NZ, so why couldn't we win? the last time we toured NZ we drew, so nothing is impossible.Powell= 23west indies average age is not good. we have 2 young players..Bravo and Powell...a third is Gabriel Plays.
all the rest are up there starting with shive at almost 39-40. gayle 33, samuels 32, shillingford 27, Best 32..Roach younger..23? but well played out already...Rampaul 28, Deo 28-29..Edwrads 27-28, Sammy 28, Ramdin 28..close to 30 average
Darren Bravo 24
Roach= 24
Gabriel 24
Narine= 24
Shillingford= 30
Permaul= 23
I understand what you're saying but half of the team right now is under 25, which is decent, i want to see more young batters emerging because the bowling crop looks very decent at the moment with Delorn Johnson, Holder and Beaton waiting in the wings, we will see who can come through and put their hand up over the next year or so, there's some talented one's out there like Leon Johnson, Carter etc, but it's just a matter of them finding some consistency.