It obvious he is clueless about the concept you are showing that prevails at that site .
This individual calls on Admin every time he sees things he doesn't like . I call folks as such RATS.
We all know where Rats live .
It shows a presence of a preferred few who are not held accountable to the same standards as others are .
deh tell me you are a real female socafighter but that does not eliminate the need to describe you as the skunt that you demonstate yuhself to be in these pages. a dumb backward westindian woman, steeped in comes and malicious behaviour, bad-minded to a fault, singularly unfogiving and unfriendly
It shows a presence of a preferred few who are not held accountable to the same standards as others are
you talk this kind of talk but do yu believe you can hold yourself to that standard in life?
the fact that you talk it, hold it up for others, means you are so silly and childishly subjective that you speak the nonsensde as if you can
where ever you find yourself in the world, in employment, in capitalism, in socialism, everywhere and anywhere, you are going to find such favouritism which appears to be a social embed, part of the fabric of life.
you will not be able to be as scrupulously honest in life to be consistent with any such principle. it is totally impractical to adhere to any such thing. and whevere you find such and you try to deal with it in any way at all you would injure established interests ,who would retaliate and cause you pain and hurt and loss. in extreme cases even your life!
would you be willing to risk all that?
we have to make-out the best way we can in the existing circumstances, learn the material circumstances which can produce social settings in which such favoruitism is unnecessary. such democratic circumstances which addresses the needs of all can in time produce collective and individual safety to the extent that people cease to fear each other, and can be safely fair with each other.
I see right here on this mesage board Bally reluctant to call you on your undue focus on sissy.com that you bring here, on the dispute you have with that entity. Bally is yuh friend and he does not want to distance you it appears.
but how does that help the fan? how does it help define what the fan is all about in a postive way...this endless abusive, negatively critical focus on an entity that is going strong, totally unmindful of all the abusive noise in this yet miniscule corner..the fan?
talk about ranting! I am accused of ranting yet there is a constant rant here about sissy from you and mewsarshi, your alter-ego, that contributes nothing positive and really ruins this publication, giving the impression that comes' and minding the business of others in rage, jealousy and rejection of you is all we like and are about here..that we have nothing unique of we own that is worthwhile and can grow on.
such is the rage of a woman scorned!
you talk about solutions when I criticise! well heres one: why dont you try to build the fan into the board you expected and wanted sissy to be? I am sure that does not include the ban-minded, constant attack on sissy you use the fan for.
you see thats what you are socafighter..an attack dog who has commandered bally's board and is honing it into a weapon against sissy. thats makes you a warlord woman..ah wajank as we used to call such back in Titty...all the symptoms of a womam scorned and who cannot get over it. refuses to get over it and move on!
so who cares if narine practices favourtism. right here bally does the same thing for you. that is narines problem anyway, and it is not Ballys responsibility to hold Narine and his publication up to any standard at all.
if yu think it is yours then do so without the fan because I take full resentment to any such thing...every so ofetn you open up the fan there is some crap about sissy and when you try to make something of it you run into a flow of abuse from who is a woman scorned, who cyar make friends, refuses to make friends and holds everything personal and permanent, no forgiveness, constant war..seeking no understanding and transforming disputes into friendship
this is the case I drew to Ballys attention: is he going to build a board with a definite and unique personailty, standing on its own, successful and growing? or is he going to pander to such backward female, malicious and vengeful bad-talking..the results and reaction of a woman scorned and makinfg us all pay for the hurt she feels by dragging us all into the mud with her?
Mewsarshi and socafighter cyan start a board defined by oppostion to sissy..an anti-sissy.com, and indulge to allyuh hearts content in bashing Narine and his publication, morning noon and night? and everybody who want to cyan join allyuh and start to beat too! nothing at all cyan stop allyuh from doing dat!
but why must the fan be involved, full of posts concerned with and attacking sissy.com. and when anyone get involved trying to make some sense and validity of the posts, they must say what socafighter wants to hear and see, or risk her considerable wrath.
socafighter, the warlordd empress of the fan, defines the fan, making it clear to all who may have wanted to come to these pages, to be prepared for war, if they are not ready to read incessantly about sissy.com and ryan narine! and to pay homage to her and her opinions on that matter, as the majority intellectual content of the fan
