for a problem at hand manufacturers bounded and disciplined by their bottom lines will can and do often respond with manufactures insufficient to meet the perceived need.
the question is: will the people buy it anyway, will they know whats going on, are they sophisticated enough to understand whats going on and so protect themselves:roll:
what I see here is a player suffering a blow to a part of his head, unprotected by the available helmetry and died. instantly I recognized a ridiculous situation that should have been addressed from the start by those who make helmets...side-on is not fully protected and that the batsman enjoys a false sense of protection from the helmet he is using..which helmet offers in fact little no protection at all
from simple, easy, obvious evidence in front of out eyes, for all to see that is indeed the case and the designers of the helmets in use MUST HAVE KNOWN THIS..UNLESS THEY ARE INCOMPETENT, IDIOTIC, STUPID, MYOPIC, HAVE SIGHT PROBLEMS LIKE BOSSMAN.
the are making a defective product..rather a useless product and selling it for money..and a player died..not to mention countless injury every day that the helmet is supposed to protect against..
THE OBVIOUS RESPONSE IS TO NOTE THE USELESS AND DANGEROUS QUALITY OF THE DAM PRODUCT IN USE, AND IMMEDIATELY FIND ALTERNATIVES..REDESIGN IN LIGHT OF NEW DEVELOPMENTS, EVIDENCE OF WHAT IN FACT MUST BE PROTECTED AND IS NOT PROTECTED WITH THE CURRENT DESIGN...AND FIND NEW MORE DURABLE MATERIALS THAT ARE LIGHT YET STRONG AND FLEXIBLE