Chris Gayle, living it large, scoring nothing ... again.

West Indies cricket discussions
MarcusGarveyLives
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:14 pm

Unread post

MarcusGarveyLives wrote:Image

Will India's bowling attack be sufficiently mediocre and the wicket sufficiently flat for our 'batting superstar' to score big?
... No and No.

CH Gayle c MM Sharma b Mohammed Shami 21


Chris Gayle, self-destructing in 3, 2,..

Cricket World Cup: West Indies Let Down by Shocking Chris Gayle Innings

A complete and utter embarrassment to listen to and to watch.
MarcusGarveyLives
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:14 pm

Unread post

... it is certainly fortunate that we have managed to overcome the mighty United Arab Emirates today despite the absence of out T20 franchise batting superstar due to his bad back ...

Image

Chris Gayle shows off his football skills (and bad back), India v West Indies, World Cup 2015, Group B, Perth, 5 March 2015
User avatar
howzdat
Posts: 3507
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:15 am

Unread post

ICC Cricket World Cup, 4th Quarter-Final: New Zealand v West Indies at Wellington, Mar 21, 2015
New Zealand won the toss and elected to bat
New Zealand 393/6 (50.0 ov)
West Indies 250 (30.3 ov)
New Zealand won by 143 runs
via cricinfo:
Milne's pace. raw pace. Sends Gayle back. This is excellent cricket. Just sheer raw pace. On a length, pretty quick, it's 149.1ks, Gayle is late into the big booming drive, and inside edge hits the stumps. What a valiant big-man-on-the-burning deck effort by the limping Gayle here. Some very clean hitting, but also he had nothing to lose so that mind have freed his mind a little 120/5
CH Gayle b Milne 61 top score
Last edited by howzdat on Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
mikesiva
Posts: 19320
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
Contact:

Unread post

Well, at least Gayle ended the World Cup with 61 from 33 balls...what did the other batsmen do in this quarterfinal against NZ?
:P
The future without Gayle looks bright indeed...yeah, right!
:roll:
MarcusGarveyLives
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:14 pm

Unread post

ICC Cricket World Cup, 4th Quarter-Final: New Zealand v West Indies at Wellington, 21 March 2015:

Image

CH Gayle b Milne 61

Image

... now please retire from international cricket so that we can all move on and you can try and pay off your tax bill by pursuing your career as an international light entertainer.
MarcusGarveyLives
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:14 pm

Unread post

Update from Kentucky Fried Cricket ...

Gayle opted out of Chennai clash

Image

Conserving energy.
User avatar
mikesiva
Posts: 19320
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
Contact:

Unread post

'Chris Gayle has stated that while he appreciates the gesture, he will henceforth no longer wear the orange cap awarded to the leading run scorer of the IPL if the opportunity ever came his way again. Gayle cited aesthetic reasons for his decision. "Totally messes up my colour scheme, man," moaned the Royal Challengers Bangalore opener. "Bright orange on top of red and gold? Are you kidding me? The last time something clashed so hard, Ottis Gibson was coach and I was trying to get back into the West Indies team."'

http://www.espncricinfo.com/blogs/conte ... 73795.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:lol: :lol:
User avatar
Googley
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:05 pm

Unread post

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Gayle might be moving to India soon if this keeps up!
User avatar
howzdat
Posts: 3507
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:15 am

Unread post

"Chris Gayle, living it large, scoring nothing again" is 14424 views not out.
User avatar
mikesiva
Posts: 19320
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
Contact:

Unread post

Gayle and KP might be good friends, but there are differences between the two when it comes to the nature of their conflicts with their respective boards....

http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/co ... 77049.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply