How's this for Lloyd's logic?
'Denesh Ramdin, 30, a veteran of 69 Tests, led the Test team for a year, over 13 Tests, from home series against New Zealand last year to the most recent, against Australia. According to Lloyd, Ramdin understood when the reasons for the switch were explained. The main issue was his recent disappointing batting form:
as captain, he averaged 22, with 57 his highest score. Yet it was clear from the beginning that Lloyd was sold on Holder to lead in both formats. He now described him as "a young man that all of the selectors, people in the Caribbean and worldwide believe has several of the qualities that can take our team forward". Deryck Murray, former wicketkeeper and Lloyd's deputy during the heady days of West Indies' domination in the 1980s, wasn't buying it. He was concerned that it was too early to thrust Holder into the position. He was "a little bit confused" since Holder had returned from the World Cup and fit into the Test team under Ramdin for the home series against England and Australia. "I am not sure as to what is the policy," he said.'
http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/co ... 18207.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So, you're not happy with Ramdin's batting, averaging 22, so you replace him with a man who averages a mammoth 34!
That's competitive value, all right....