Re: Racists Cricket Intellectuals at CC Com ...Boomer
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:53 am
A placid site if is that what you seek will not grow or improve , it needs a spark to attract new ideas and opinions . Just look at the amount of failures and diagnose why .
The author of this thread is showing flaws that this forum should avoid , which is obviously beyond you .
For those who are aware of me and my background would say I dont need a forum to seek gratification of any type . I am very confident in what ever I do .
My focus has been improvement in T&T Cricket thus improving West Indies Cricket if I see things that have questions , I dont sit on my arse , I seek answers . You may view that as seeking the limelight I do not. The various Administrators of West Indian Cricket are aware of me , I have had correspondence with almost all of them , asking questions .The Administrator of this forum can support me on that , often I cc him.
I tend to look at the views of threads , the numbers show repeat viewers .The Author of this thread have had some of the highest numbers posted to date that I have seen . He must be doing something correct or would be ignored.
He is not my alter ego , I hope he keeps posting for along time and not give up based on your babbles.[/quote]
no..far from a placid site! but I cant stand the wasetful focus on narine.
if you are going to deal with narine/sissy from the angle you have described then what has been going on is not the ambient in which to do it. you are not seeing that project..sissy.. whole, where it is strong and positive, where it is weak and an be attacked positively, with some benefit to you and all the concerns you express.
you are warlording and that wont do!
when you attack them you have to do it in the manner of the positive alternative you mean. I must read your critique and see something better in it, the solid alternative you propose. but when I read you all I see is full and total attack on narine and dat is not right. there is nothing in the world that is totally negative or positive. no matter what you say there are good things about sissy and sensible observers know this.
you immdiatetly hit yourself a lash when you attack sissy in such a manner, by turning off your prospective adherents.
in the circumstances it is to win the market for whatever you represent. that is the best effect you can have. you have have to have something to sell as better than sissy, representative of all you decry them for. in the end the determinant is the market, sissy, the fan, 446 and its green-eye, and others are playing in.
it is a westindian market with some small slice of interested forriners. it is a small market, on pcs which limits it even further for all westindians, even in the diaspora dont have computers, and can afford the net, outside of free libraries etc. if you can figure out a way to win most of these people who are in the market then you wont have posters.
then again westindians, all or most, are a certain undeveloped way...the very way you accuse sissy of being.
it may be that westindians steeped in that sort of thing like sissy for that very reason and wont move from there. if so you pissing in the wind, dreaming, full of idealist principles tha have no pratical aplication, especially the way you are going about getting them acrosss.
as i see it, your job is cut out for you if you want to reform sissy by long distance attack. you have to build the alernative if you can... and now you may have a better idea of the difficulties in that, if you did not have such before.
the only way as I see it for there to be movement, change to produce what you seem to have in mind is for there to be reform and social development in the westindies itself, changing the westindian people, resulting in a more postive and developing social experience and reality.
and that at this stage looks far, far into the future, if such social change does not take place first, in the centre of world society, spreading outwards...or at least killing the power of the empire so that the local peoples of nations can carry out their own changes without the empire stopping them.
in the meantime full and free and wide as possible, creative, conroversial but relevant argument and debate on the fan may go a long way towards creating the very thing you want as implied by your critique of sissy. to my mind it is to get that thing, to create it....the alternative inherent in your critique...what you want that you did not get at sissy..rather than wasting time blasting narine and dem all the time
thats negative, unproducive, a waste of time.
The author of this thread is showing flaws that this forum should avoid , which is obviously beyond you .
For those who are aware of me and my background would say I dont need a forum to seek gratification of any type . I am very confident in what ever I do .
My focus has been improvement in T&T Cricket thus improving West Indies Cricket if I see things that have questions , I dont sit on my arse , I seek answers . You may view that as seeking the limelight I do not. The various Administrators of West Indian Cricket are aware of me , I have had correspondence with almost all of them , asking questions .The Administrator of this forum can support me on that , often I cc him.
I tend to look at the views of threads , the numbers show repeat viewers .The Author of this thread have had some of the highest numbers posted to date that I have seen . He must be doing something correct or would be ignored.
He is not my alter ego , I hope he keeps posting for along time and not give up based on your babbles.[/quote]
no..far from a placid site! but I cant stand the wasetful focus on narine.
if you are going to deal with narine/sissy from the angle you have described then what has been going on is not the ambient in which to do it. you are not seeing that project..sissy.. whole, where it is strong and positive, where it is weak and an be attacked positively, with some benefit to you and all the concerns you express.
you are warlording and that wont do!
when you attack them you have to do it in the manner of the positive alternative you mean. I must read your critique and see something better in it, the solid alternative you propose. but when I read you all I see is full and total attack on narine and dat is not right. there is nothing in the world that is totally negative or positive. no matter what you say there are good things about sissy and sensible observers know this.
you immdiatetly hit yourself a lash when you attack sissy in such a manner, by turning off your prospective adherents.
in the circumstances it is to win the market for whatever you represent. that is the best effect you can have. you have have to have something to sell as better than sissy, representative of all you decry them for. in the end the determinant is the market, sissy, the fan, 446 and its green-eye, and others are playing in.
it is a westindian market with some small slice of interested forriners. it is a small market, on pcs which limits it even further for all westindians, even in the diaspora dont have computers, and can afford the net, outside of free libraries etc. if you can figure out a way to win most of these people who are in the market then you wont have posters.
then again westindians, all or most, are a certain undeveloped way...the very way you accuse sissy of being.
it may be that westindians steeped in that sort of thing like sissy for that very reason and wont move from there. if so you pissing in the wind, dreaming, full of idealist principles tha have no pratical aplication, especially the way you are going about getting them acrosss.
as i see it, your job is cut out for you if you want to reform sissy by long distance attack. you have to build the alernative if you can... and now you may have a better idea of the difficulties in that, if you did not have such before.
the only way as I see it for there to be movement, change to produce what you seem to have in mind is for there to be reform and social development in the westindies itself, changing the westindian people, resulting in a more postive and developing social experience and reality.
and that at this stage looks far, far into the future, if such social change does not take place first, in the centre of world society, spreading outwards...or at least killing the power of the empire so that the local peoples of nations can carry out their own changes without the empire stopping them.
in the meantime full and free and wide as possible, creative, conroversial but relevant argument and debate on the fan may go a long way towards creating the very thing you want as implied by your critique of sissy. to my mind it is to get that thing, to create it....the alternative inherent in your critique...what you want that you did not get at sissy..rather than wasting time blasting narine and dem all the time
thats negative, unproducive, a waste of time.