Every action taken has been taken by the CSA - what it is about that you fail to understand.mapoui wrote:we dont have to! the ICC say no political intervention. no government must intervene in local or domestic cricket processes period. what dont yu undrerstand english?
NOW!!!!!! Let me Hear The ICC On This.
- Arnik
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
we have a case here where the RSA government through its sports minister intervened in RSA cricket to have its CEO investigated and suspended from office..and a host of relevant moves and appointments to keep the situation going.
there is no doubt about that. it constitutes interference. the ICC shud have soemthng to say about it! where are they?
there is no doubt about that. it constitutes interference. the ICC shud have soemthng to say about it! where are they?
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
yo! as antiguans wud say..."'top waste time!"Every action taken has been taken by the CSA - what it is about that you fail to understand.
yu defend cosmetics to protect what, who...the ICC?
I dont understand why yu arguing. we know what went on. and because it is RSA..still a white racist white cricketing country with always the cosmetic one white and 1 indo player..the ICC will say nutten
Last edited by mapoui on Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Arnik
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm
That may be so since I do not really follow CSA but the article DOES NOT SAY THAT.mapoui wrote:we have a case here where the RSA government through its sports minister intervened in RSA cricket to have its CEO investigated and suspended from office..and a host of relevant moves and appointments to keep the situation going.
- Arnik
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm
I am not defending the ICC merely arguing that the events in SA are NOT the same as the events in Guyana.mapoui wrote:yo! as antiguans wud say..."'top waste time!"
yu defend cosmetics to protect what, who...the ICC?
I dont understand why yu arguing. we know what went on. and because it is RSA..still a white racist white cricketing country with always the cosmetic one white and 1 indo player..the ICC will say nutten
As far as this racist thing goes I know where you are coming from:
Our cricket is our responsibility, not a responsibility of those two racist and crackpot multinationals, Digicell and Cable and Wireless. Already they too much a part ofur national business, attending all wicb meetings, regardless of what is discussed, pulling strings and determining what happens in our life with regard to cricket and lords knows what else.
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
the artricel establishes that the minister of sports initiated the process. if he did than all that has followed is from his action and accroding to his intent. he is the boss.
it appears to me that if the guyan government had decided to kerry out its actions from behind the scenes, using the offices of the GCB yu would have been quite happy to call it the farce it would have been and maitain that there was no goverment intervention.
the GCB was illegal and had to be wound up and reconstituted lawfully. they could not play with it ...or through it. but yu wud have been happy anyway
it appears to me that if the guyan government had decided to kerry out its actions from behind the scenes, using the offices of the GCB yu would have been quite happy to call it the farce it would have been and maitain that there was no goverment intervention.
the GCB was illegal and had to be wound up and reconstituted lawfully. they could not play with it ...or through it. but yu wud have been happy anyway
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
where did yu pull that from?As far as this racist thing goes I know where you are coming from:
Our cricket is our responsibility, not a responsibility of those two racist and crackpot multinationals, Digicell and Cable and Wireless. Already they too much a part ofur national business, attending all wicb meetings, regardless of what is discussed, pulling strings and determining what happens in our life with regard to cricket and lords knows what else.
yu have all that I say archived and catalouged?
thats a brilliant summation. take it apart man. lets watch yu do it!
- Arnik
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm
We have had this discussion before. The GCB is NOT and never was ILLEGAL.mapoui wrote:the GCB was illegal and had to be wound up and reconstituted lawfully. they could not play with it ...or through it. but yu wud have been happy anyway
So you saying that the GCB had to be wound up and reconstituted lawfully is just not true.
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
south african cricket is still racist and nasty-minded.
I do not like that team depsite it is african. their interal organisation is still all that it ever was and it treats its blac players improperly. just ask ashley prince.
and let me make it clear to you Arnik. I have no qualms about what I say here, nor am I apologetic, scared or afraid of whaveter the hell yu think in the matter..or whatever the hell yu do.
when yu do I will examine yu..as thoruoughly, comprehensively as I can. you better be straight up!
I do not like that team depsite it is african. their interal organisation is still all that it ever was and it treats its blac players improperly. just ask ashley prince.
and let me make it clear to you Arnik. I have no qualms about what I say here, nor am I apologetic, scared or afraid of whaveter the hell yu think in the matter..or whatever the hell yu do.
when yu do I will examine yu..as thoruoughly, comprehensively as I can. you better be straight up!
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
if I remember rightly dat is wat the AG said was'nt it?So you saying that the GCB had to be wound up and reconstituted lawfully is just not true.
and the GCB is wound up isnt it!
and legislation is passed...or being passed to regularise its postion...the position of the new organisation that is to run BG cricket?