Googley wrote:go look at these first then you will understand why
http://www.cricinfo.com/legends-of-cric ... line=45063" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
well Bally! you cyan now see fuh yuhself the consistentcy of the 'unusual reasoning that leads to the actions that I bus the man up for.
if its not sknash in the face of truth, its Gavaskar in the face of truth.
there are two batsmen who are all time greats in the world..greater even than Bradman for there is no way 'sir don" could have bat like dem..and deh are Tendulkar and lara.
di'ze it right deh! no one else, not even Kanhai...the heights!
when yuh want to talk Gavaskar you have to look to his group...Boycott, Greenidge, Haynes, Gooch, Gower, Cowdrey, Kallis, Dravid, Miandad, Majid etc.
to get to Lara and Tendy that group have to hop over kanhai, Sobers, Viv, Greg Chappell, Barry Sheppard, Graeme Pollock...real skillful and most of all creative batsmen, who pushed batting to great heights, extended limits, explored the full potential of what a man could do with a bat and revealed new paths to follow to achieve more...which is where Lara and Tendy come in.
Gavaskar is not there at all no matter how many runs he accumulated and high avarage and all dat.
weird eh ! after gavaskar he will prolly say sknash and bring out a case that even if sknash only play a few tess and scored a few tons against weak bowling in featherbed conditions ia how he scored...........