1st Test: West Indies v South Africa

West Indies cricket discussions
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

Day 1

South Africa 70/3 (34.0 ov)
User avatar
badpepper
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:03 am

Unread post

BallOil wrote:
badpepper wrote:What time we start today?
should be 10 but might get an early start to make for yesterday..
Only 34 overs yesterday. They should start early.
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

lets see...WI bowled well restricting SA and taking wickets too...
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

PL Harris c Shillingford b Benn 10

SA 91/4
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

JH Kallis lbw b Shillingford 28

SA 107/5
User avatar
badpepper
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:03 am

Unread post

BallOil wrote:JH Kallis lbw b Shillingford 28

SA 107/5
That's a big one. :D
mapoui
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Unread post

I was wondering about that shillingford...all these years taking all those wiekcts in dung heap. it looks like he cyan bowl.

some people on Aficionado must be angry fuh so! no Jaggernath! it looks like the selectors did not like dat fella at all at all!
mapoui
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Unread post

but deh have tuh break dis partneeship. right there with those 2 RSA is very strong
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

yeah...they used up all the reviews for this innings... they have to break this pair soon.... Shillingford is leading the attack on his debut :)
mapoui
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Unread post

BallOil wrote:yeah...they used up all the reviews for this innings... they have to break this pair soon.... Shillingford is leading the attack on his debut :)

the benefit of a lil maturity?

shillingford has been around dung heap for soemtime now. what is he middle late twenties?
Post Reply