West Indies Cricket Fans

What a response by Australia.

Clarke now has 20 hundreds in 84 tests - pretty good. Good first century by Cowan.

I expected the SA bowlers to do better. Lack of a spinner came back to bite them since the 4th seamer went for plenty.

I see yuh still care very much about forrin cricket

mapoui wrote:I see yuh still care very much about forrin cricket

You need to spell out what you mean by "care".

If I get a chance I watch all kinds of cricket, "forrin" or not.

Why limit myself to WI cricket or no cricket at all??

I doh know bwoy..but I still cant call watchin' kallis and clark an dem bat cricket

wat dem fellas and dem play seems a world apart from what I used to watch back in the day.
oh well..to each his own

mapoui wrote:I doh know bwoy..but I still cant call watchin' kallis and clark an dem bat cricket
wat dem fellas and dem play seems a world apart from what I used to watch back in the day.
oh well..to each his own

Dat is you. You living in the past.

Life has moved on, cricket has moved on. Clarke and Kallis are good batsmen.

Life has moved on

doh mix movement with quality...deh are not the same

movement always is moving and it aint all necessary good even if it always moves, condition of existence..movement..

but quality now...ahhhhhh! there you go. sobers, kanhai, lloyd, Butcher, Nurse, Richards...

oh my gord! is like people giving you canadian crow whiskey fuh 11 dollars ah bottle in an LCBO as opposed to quality malted whisky up in the clouds.

so go on with yuh moving on bad self...with yuh Kallis and dem kinda oddities calling demselves batsmen...Methuselah kinda fella, old like salt and wun lay down.

the day somebody make ah mistake an' sprinkle some dirt on Kallis the gigs up. the impse musta mek ah deal with the devil to go on forever playin' cricket. that forriner so old he must be walking dead.

some dirt shud put him outta his misery. throw some on him and see what happens

mapoui wrote:doh mix movement with quality...deh are not the same
movement always is moving and it aint all necessary good even if it always moves, condition of existence..movement..
but quality now...ahhhhhh! there you go. sobers, kanhai, lloyd, Butcher, Nurse, Richards...
oh my gord! is like people giving you canadian crow whiskey fuh 11 dollars ah bottle in an LCBO as opposed to quality malted whisky up in the clouds.

Now yuh exposing yourself - ha ha ha.

Yuh sound like dem folks used to sound back in de 70s - no cricketer was as good as Bradman, Hobbs, Sutcliff, Lindwall etc etc.

Richie Benaud still commentating and he nuh sound like you. He does not moan about how players back in his day are soooo much better than those of today.

well Richie have a wuk to do so on the air he is working and follows the rules..doh give no personal opinion willy nilly on the air

on the other hand if you sit down in conversation with him.....!! try dat and lemmih know what he say


also lemmih say that quality is also movement eh..in expression of artistry in whatever. anything that does not move is dead.....etc.

but dem fellas I listed moved wel, beautifully, brilliantly. I doh know wat to call Kallis and dem movement

mapoui wrote:well Richie have a wuk to do so on the air he is working and follows the rules..doh give no personal opinion willy nilly on the air

Richie does talk his mind. He not sugar coating.

mapoui wrote:but dem fellas I listed moved wel, beautifully, brilliantly. I doh know wat to call Kallis and dem movement

Nothing wrong with the movement of Clarke and Kallis. Yesteryear cricket not necessarily better than today much as old time Windians want everyone to believe.

well..how old are you

I know yesterday, today an' in-between cricket. which cricket you know

I can make a comparison..can you

how old are you