I am not concerned with whatever the hell goes on at sissy Bally. dats no thing to me! the Sammy issue is! that is crucial!BallOil wrote:except for the Sammy bit... I think Jala nailed it in his opening post. is the environment breeding this type of behavior?
The cesspool that is caribbeancricket.com
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
- BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
Mapoui, in the context of the first post you should. What type of environment is it? Obviously, sissy have some moral responsibility,no?mapoui wrote:I am not concerned with whatever the hell goes on at sissy Bally. dats no thing to me! the Sammy issue is! that is crucial!BallOil wrote:except for the Sammy bit... I think Jala nailed it in his opening post. is the environment breeding this type of behavior?
- Googley
- Posts: 5465
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:05 pm
Bally, you are taking one chap slanted view too seriously! remember people who get banned and come over here have an axe to grind! So take what they say with a grain of salt!BallOil wrote:Mapoui, in the context of the first post you should. What type of environment is it? Obviously, sissy have some moral responsibility,no?mapoui wrote:I am not concerned with whatever the hell goes on at sissy Bally. dats no thing to me! the Sammy issue is! that is crucial!BallOil wrote:except for the Sammy bit... I think Jala nailed it in his opening post. is the environment breeding this type of behavior?

- BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
point taken Googs..Googley wrote:BallOil wrote:Bally, you are taking one chap slanted view too seriously! remember people who get banned and come over here have an axe to grind! So take what they say with a grain of salt!mapoui wrote: Mapoui, in the context of the first post you should. What type of environment is it? Obviously, sissy have some moral responsibility,no?

-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
Jala...no matter how yuh try to twist de argument and try to get it in your favor....Sammy is ridiculed by lots of folks cause its justified and its on him to go out on the cricket field and prove all the naysayers wrong...so far he is doing de opposite...
Your problem is when yuh assume someone's stance in all you discussion, yuh retaliate like a little sissy and cry discrimination....I have a feeling dat yuh won't survive here also fuh too long cause anodda one of those "Jala is a Jackass" thread will start soon!!!
Try and change yuh stlye and yuh may get accepted in a civilize society!!!!

Your problem is when yuh assume someone's stance in all you discussion, yuh retaliate like a little sissy and cry discrimination....I have a feeling dat yuh won't survive here also fuh too long cause anodda one of those "Jala is a Jackass" thread will start soon!!!




Try and change yuh stlye and yuh may get accepted in a civilize society!!!!


-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
sissy.com operates on the principle of traditional westindian relations of force. they own the board and cyan do on it as they please.Mapoui, in the context of the first post you should. What type of environment is it? Obviously, sissy have some moral responsibility,no?
thats it! all who post there like that way of life, as westindian that is what we know, what we have all grown up with..relations of force
when people run from sissy it is not because they are decent like sammy is claimed to be, by one of the runners. but it is because they have been defeated and their own brand of force and subjectivity can find no place amongst the rest there on sissy, vying for a piece of sissys sun.
did Jala did not run because he is a democrat looking for free air to breathe and cavort in, in equality with the rest in that space?
absolutely not! Jala is simply looking for a space in which his particular subjective and sectarian nonsense can find unopposed space, and what he may see as acceptance. this space here on the Fan, is free but there are in it those who would oppose Jala.
if Jala cyar take dat opposition he is off again and running, looking for that place in the back of his mind, where his 'justified' subjectivity can find peace and freedom.
and so he is gone, looking. best of luck to him. it would be better if he stayed in one place and acceped the world for what it is and battled his way through with a preparedness to change and compromise, when truth irrevocably and undeniably intruded.
but for no reason, and to appease no one at all will I accept Sammy as captain of the westindies, accept any unfounded claims of his decency when I see no decency on his part at all...and to shut my mouth just to keep them happy with their bullshit...while westindies cricket dies due to the indecency of the very man they claims to be decent
Last edited by mapoui on Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
BallOil wrote:Mapoui, in the context of the first post you should. What type of environment is it? Obviously, sissy have some moral responsibility,no?mapoui wrote:I am not concerned with whatever the hell goes on at sissy Bally. dats no thing to me! the Sammy issue is! that is crucial!BallOil wrote:except for the Sammy bit... I think Jala nailed it in his opening post. is the environment breeding this type of behavior?
Jala did nat nailed squat in his first post cause he was juss being a cry baby looking fuh sympathy from posters here...



Anyhow - who yuh like in dat Saturday showdown? Its a win/win fuh me....to see TENDY or MURALI holding dat trophy....I gave SL de edge though!!!!

- BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
I'm just going with Jala's fuss post. He will be back to defend himself I’m sure.Westdem wrote: Jala did nat nailed squat in his first post cause he was juss being a cry baby looking fuh sympathy from posters here...![]()
He was one ah de biggest mischief makeron dat MB....
![]()
Anyhow - who yuh like in dat Saturday showdown? Its a win/win fuh me....to see TENDY or MURALI holding dat trophy....I gave SL de edge though!!!!
Regarding the WC, I think Sri Lanka has the edge too but both players had a good career and this game is a fitting send off.
- BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
Jala will be back to defend his stance...I'm sure he has important matters to tend to. However, we as good citizens of the world should set out brothers in the right path when necessary but not isolate them nor run em out.mapoui wrote:sissy.com operates on the principle of traditional westindian relations of force. they own the board and cyan do on it as they please.Mapoui, in the context of the first post you should. What type of environment is it? Obviously, sissy have some moral responsibility,no?
thats it! all who post there like that way of life, as westindian that is what we know, what we have all grown up with..relations of force
when people run from sissy it is not because they are decent like sammy is claimed to be, by one of the runners. but it is because they have been defeated and their own brand of force and subjectivity can find no place amongst the rest there on sissy, vying for a piece of sissys sun.
did Jala did not run because he is a democrat looking for free air to breathe and cavort in, in equality with the rest in that space?
absolutely not! Jala is simply looking for a space in which his particular subjective and sectarian nonsense can find unopposed space, and what he may see as acceptance. this space here on the Fan, is free but there are in it those who would oppose Jala.
if Jala cyar take dat opposition he is off again and running, looking for that place in the back of his mind, where his 'justified' subjectivity can find peace and freedom.
and so he is gone, looking. best of luck to him. it would be better if he stayed in one place and acceped the world for what it is and battled his way through with a preparedness to change and compromise, when truth irrevocably and undeniably intruded.
but for no reason, and to appease no one at all will I accept Sammy as captain of the westindies, accept any unfounded claims of his decency when I see no decency on his part at all...and to shut my mouth just to keep them happy with their bullshit...while westindies cricket dies due to the indecency of the very man they claims to be decent
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
yuy know wat I doscover in life to be absolutely right and productive no matter....truth and standing up for it...np matter wat.
anything else leads to disaster!
look around and yu will see the only people who have a chance in life are those who stood up for their lives. all the rest live in varying degrees of slavery.
the one example I will cite is that of zimbabwe as oposed to RSA. Zim took its land back and the white people be dammed. in 10 years hey have all but revolutionsed Zimbabwe economically, as opposed to the slow continuing decaye of the South African people.
it follows that if the westindian people want a life they have to smarten up, take their country and make of it what it must be. otherwise the westindian people will go like they are now, slowly reversing back into the past.
what is happening in the westindies now is what we have already lived through, fought against and now by the complicty of the most stinking elite class who ever evovled anywhere, anytime in history, we have given up our oportuity and are living backwards.
and all we middle class and educated people are moving back with them, refusing to stand up with them, going along to get along in careers and all that. well we go lose it all because we do not have any strentgh to do anything. and old marse doh need we no more for anything at all.
so like gadaffi who gave up his weapons of mass destruction that could now be defending Libya from invasion, we never sought any form of independecne that could now redound to our benefit and survival as the worlds turns for the worse in capitalism decline.....
anything else leads to disaster!
look around and yu will see the only people who have a chance in life are those who stood up for their lives. all the rest live in varying degrees of slavery.
the one example I will cite is that of zimbabwe as oposed to RSA. Zim took its land back and the white people be dammed. in 10 years hey have all but revolutionsed Zimbabwe economically, as opposed to the slow continuing decaye of the South African people.
it follows that if the westindian people want a life they have to smarten up, take their country and make of it what it must be. otherwise the westindian people will go like they are now, slowly reversing back into the past.
what is happening in the westindies now is what we have already lived through, fought against and now by the complicty of the most stinking elite class who ever evovled anywhere, anytime in history, we have given up our oportuity and are living backwards.
and all we middle class and educated people are moving back with them, refusing to stand up with them, going along to get along in careers and all that. well we go lose it all because we do not have any strentgh to do anything. and old marse doh need we no more for anything at all.
so like gadaffi who gave up his weapons of mass destruction that could now be defending Libya from invasion, we never sought any form of independecne that could now redound to our benefit and survival as the worlds turns for the worse in capitalism decline.....