NOW!!!!!! Let me Hear The ICC On This.

Action from the rest of the world....
User avatar
Arnik
Posts: 4146
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm

Unread post

mapoui wrote:but we know the litany and hre story in whole no need to go over it again..the fcat is that yu appear to accept that, exult in it, dont want change, establish at all tiems the impossibility of postive change...
Man, you arrive at conclusions that make no sense.

Because somebody does not spout the rhetoric that you do means that they accept it, whatever that it is.
User avatar
Arnik
Posts: 4146
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm

Unread post

mapoui wrote:yu say, imply, adamantly that no such change is possible. I live in cannada and came here only as I did not have a chance in the westindies. and if I had developed the means to I woud have return long ago to live here doing what iwant to in a prosperous manner.
When have I ever said that.

Again it seems that if someone disagrees with what you say you then move on to drawing erroneous conclusions about their views on all sorts of topics.
User avatar
Arnik
Posts: 4146
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm

Unread post

mapoui wrote:I have no time with your negativeity. i know life and there is absolutely no gurantee about anything. but we have gotten to where we are not by thinking and talking like you do. thats the pits. we know its difficult, well nigh impossibel, but so what. we have a choice?
What negativity? Because someone disagrees with you they are negative.

My argument was that the situation in SA is different from the one in Guyana.
Let's put it another way. We all know that FIFA brooks no government interference in football. My argument is that FIFA would have had a problem with what happened in Guyana but none at all with the SA situation.

In none of this do I necessarily disagree with what the government in Guyana did.
mapoui
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Unread post

yu appear to be a person that is bent on creating maximum confusion not clarity.

you do not have an idea at the base of all yu say that I can discern save a rightwing one..one that is capitalist as yu know it, conservative and status quo.

apart form that yu are all over the place on what I say..on the things yu do say, that appear to be your own opinion.

in all that yu are absolultely negative realtive to the total needs of the westindies. yu have something yu feel yu have to defend which must be at the basis of your conservaism. it has to be class and or ethnic.

you are Indo for sure and indos are doing well in the region..afros are not. that surely is the perspective from which you flow. and if I am wrong it cannot be by much.

tha administration of cricket in the westindies must be reformed, changed, brought into current requirements for success. such change cannot be achieved throughgt the procees that exists and by the people who occupy that process

that is the goal not an argument betwen yu and I. the state of the procee of change is important. and what we have on the ground so far is interesting.

what yu expect of it is ridculous and helps no one. it is like a bath of very cold water in the circumstances, killing all positive expectation. and yu refer to yourself as not negative.

be serious!
User avatar
Arnik
Posts: 4146
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm

Unread post

mapoui wrote:yu appear to be a person that is bent on creating maximum confusion not clarity.
Well, I was trying bring some clarity to your argument that what happened in SA is the same as what happened in Guyana.
you do not have an idea at the base of all yu say that I can discern save a rightwing one..one that is capitalist as yu know it, conservative and status quo.
Wow you can tell that I am "right wing" from what is said on this board about cricket. Ok then.
apart form that yu are all over the place on what I say..on the things yu do say, that appear to be your own opinion.
This thread was about something that happened in SA. You then went on to make false statements about the situation in Guyana.
in all that yu are absolultely negative realtive to the total needs of the westindies. yu have something yu feel yu have to defend which must be at the basis of your conservaism. it has to be class and or ethnic.
What have I defended other than saying that IMO the situation in SA was different and also that the courts DID NOT say that the GCB was an illegal entity.
you are Indo for sure and indos are doing well in the region..afros are not. that surely is the perspective from which you flow. and if I am wrong it cannot be by much.
Now that is amusing.
tha administration of cricket in the westindies must be reformed, changed, brought into current requirements for success.
I definitely agree with you on this one.
what yu expect of it is ridculous and helps no one. it is like a bath of very cold water in the circumstances, killing all positive expectation. and yu refer to yourself as not negative.
You totally lost me here.
Post Reply