5th ODI: West Indies v Australia @ Gros Islet

West Indies cricket discussions
User avatar
Arnik
Posts: 4146
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm

Unread post

mapoui wrote:its time to leave you alone arnik. yu do not offer anythng really.
Before this series started you were the jacksass with 100 years cricket experience who said that WI would be beaten in every game and that numbers 6 to 11 for the WI could not bat.

AND YOU OFFER SOMETHING?

And then you comparing with a test game in 1968. I surprised you aint go back to 1938. I reckon you must be all of 85 years old.
mapoui
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Unread post

the comparson with 1968 is apt. STUPIDITY!

as michael manley argued: YU DO NOT GIVE YOUR OPPOSiTION A CHANCE YOU DO NOT HAVE FOR YOURSELF!

sobers could not win, at least half os his attck was injured. he was left with hiumself and gibbs. he opened the bowling with Lloyd a batsman and himself.

westindies had no chance at all of wining..and every chance of losing with such a depleted attack yet he declared.

that was childish and stupid in the extreme. this here byu Gibbo and Sammy is childish in the extreme.

I said so from the start..before play started..not after play started!

stupidty then, stupidity now. and it has spread to this mesage baodr and envelops arnik.

actually mental retardation is what it is!
User avatar
Arnik
Posts: 4146
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm

Unread post

mapoui wrote:stupidty then, stupidity now. and it has spread to this mesage baodr and envelops arnik.
The only retard I recall is the one who whined about WI losing every game in this ODI series or maybe you conveniently forgot that!!
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

AUS 193/3 from 36.4 Overs, Bailey c Russell b Roach 19
User avatar
Arnik
Posts: 4146
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm

Unread post

mapoui wrote:sobers could not win, at least half os his attck was injured. he was left with hiumself and gibbs. he opened the bowling with Lloyd a batsman and himself.

westindies had no chance at all of wining..and every chance of losing with such a depleted attack yet he declared.
Oh, is that what happened? I was not born then so I have no idea what you are talking about.
User avatar
Arnik
Posts: 4146
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm

Unread post

mapoui wrote:that was childish and stupid in the extreme. this here byu Gibbo and Sammy is childish in the extreme.
I said so from the start..before play started..not after play started!
With over 100 years of cricket knowledge you are the fount of all wisdom. Steupsss.
mapoui
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Unread post

Before this series started you were the jacksass with 100 years cricket experience who said that WI would be beaten in every game and that numbers 6 to 11 for the WI could not bat.

AND YOU OFFER SOMETHING?

And then you comparing with a test game in 1968. I surprised you aint go back to 1938. I reckon you must be all of 85 years old.
oh yes I offer soemthing...its here for all to see.

westindies life and cricket lives in a sea of crap..and worrell and Lloyd can be looked at as cricket Moses who parted that shitty sea and brought difference, success, intelligence.

but the sea was always there threatening to swallow up their achievements... and it did.

in the residue of Worrell we had sobers success for a minute..and Viv for a minute after Lloyd. but with the emergence of Richardson the sea of crap swallowed us up again and here we are.

I had hoped the emergencs of Indos wud bring a measure of smarts, intelligence, sel-centred practicality to westindian life that afros appear to lack.. that wud have made stupidty like this decison right here impossible..I believed Indos are smarter than that..or I once believed it.

since chetram singh, the guyana debacle, and a whole lot of indo posters on these boards.. arnik.. that belief is now seriously in question. it looks like its in the westindian waters..the cause. all man stricken with backwardness, ingrained subservience and stupidity.

it seems indos are practical in certain ways but not generally..and can make no dent in overall westindian backwarness..as far as I see here.

the region is going nowhere if this is in fact the case. afros are useless and but for their areas of practicality indos are no better..espcially if we are to judge by arniks arguments
DMan
Posts: 4117
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 11:02 am

Unread post

I think you 2 need a private chat room. :lol:
User avatar
Arnik
Posts: 4146
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm

Unread post

mapoui wrote:oh yes I offer soemthing...its here for all to see.

westindies life and cricket lives in a sea of crap..and worrell and Lloyd can be looked at as cricket Moses who parted that shitty sea and brough difference, success, intelligence.

but the sea was always there threatening to swallow up their achievements and it did.

in the residue of Worrell we had sobers success for a minute..and Viv for a minute after Lloyd. but with the emergence of Richardson the sea of crap swallowed us up again and here we are.

I had hoped the emergencs of Indos wud bring a measure of smarts, intelligence to westindian life that afro lack.. that wud make stupidty like this decison right here impossible..I believed Indos are smarter than that..or I once believed it.

since chetram singh, the guyan debacle, and a whole lot of indo posters on these boards.. arnik.. that belief is now seriously in question. it looks likes its in the westindian waters. all man stricken with backwardness, ingrained subservience and stupidity.

it seems indos are practical in certain ways but not generally..and can make no dent in overall westindian backwarness..as far as I see here. the area is going nowhere if this is in fact the case. afros are useless and for their areqas of practicality indos are no better..espcially if we are to judge by arniks arguments
Spare me the "history as perceived by mapoui".

Look, you may not agree with the decision made to put Australia in. I did not agree with it.
The bottom line is that like me you sitting at home watching. The assumption you are making is that WI would have made close to 300 if they batted first and that my friend is a complete unknown.

I refuse to carry on like a demented individual over a decision like that. I am enjoying the ebb and flow of the game which IMO is still in the balance.
mapoui
Posts: 8507
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm

Unread post

[quote]Oh, is that what happened? I was not born then so I have no idea what you are talking about./quote]

look how rampant the supidity is. he admits it, openely...and is not aware of how he is making himself look.. wallows in it as if it is some kind of badge of achievcement, of honour.

he talks and disapages my comparison of 1968 and he does not know what happend, the circumstances.

stupidity I tell you. youth is wasted on the young
Post Reply