nothing justifies skansh as v cap..absolutely nothing!
it is pure vindictiveness and stupidity to remove Bravo from the v cap at 25-26, a man of growing experience and professionalism, whose place on the side is secure... for sknash at 33, a mediocre capetbagger who happens to be white...the real basis of his selection.
somebody must explain the intelligence and value of sknash over Bravo to me for any reason at all, because try as I might I cant see it except for vidictiveness. the double skunts Hilaire and hunte vex Bravo and gayle seek to fatten their pockets as opposed to accepting wicb nonsense.
so they have penalised bravo as they cant Gayle who knew he was going as cappo anyway.
now suppose sknash was a player good enough to make internationa T20! what then!? would he have accepted wicb retainer in the face of all the international juice flowing?
is sknash v cap because he is there, available.... because so freaking mediocre a player he is he has no alternative but to be avaliable to the wicb, for no one else wants him for anything at all? ? ?
that being the case.,.skansh as v cap is a backward step not a forward one for the australian old man is a waste of time....and Gibsons justification above is just company generated clap trap, toing the line to keep his job.
so what are they going to do at the end of 2011 or earlier, if Sammy fails...appoint a 35 year old mediocre, carbagging rass white australian to the westindies captaincy?
lawd ah mercy!
I am divoced anway! why the rass am I bothering?