West Indies Cricket Fans

Should the WICB allow FAT and UNFIT players to play in regionals? By UNFIT, I mean both physically and mentally. Chances are they will not get selected by this fitness craze board ...

I just following along with their logic...

its a waste of limited resources no?

when we speak of unfit players we can't leave out how players operate mentally which reflect poorly on and off field and that should be the biggest unfit concern i think we have in the camp not excluding coaches

mike2bad4u wrote:when we speak of unfit players we can't leave out how players operate mentally which reflect poorly on and off field and that should be the biggest unfit concern i think we have in the camp not excluding coaches

Spot on Mike...they have to be professionals both on and off the field.

BTW, Welcome to the Fan..

So what is the deal....? A precedent has been set with Sarwan losing a contract worth over a USD 100,000 plus game fees, etc. Is there a guideline?

Wait, Lambert, Sebastien and Hinds are all captains for the four-day competition who Fans constantly referred to as overweight. Looks like they are being rewarded with leadership or coincidentally... is this sending the wrong message? What would stop them from representing WI?

Maps ..what is your take on this?

BallOil wrote:Maps ..what is your take on this?

yu ever heard of the war on drugs, or the war on terrorism, the war on crime etc...

the only way to understand those wars is to approach them as the oposite of what those terms mean.

you have to operate this way Bally: when the status quo speak they do so from a basis of exploitation. everythong they are, own, the social postion they occupy, is based on exploitation and corruption, social manipulation and propaganda...outright lies/lying.... and can only be maintained the same way.

society has a a moral basis that is opposite to corruption, necessitating that all the status quo does and must do to keep its ill-gotten social position, is couched in the terms of the principled moral basis of society. therefore they must lie all the time, state and claim they are doing the opposite of what they actually do.

so if drugs are a problem and deh set up a war on drugs to solve the drug problem, it is in fact a war for drugs, for if drugs are a problem in the first place, you can bet your bottom dollar it is they who caused it and proffited by causing it.

why again..becuase the status quo through its monopoly of force, control of the social administrative aparaus, the intellectual superstructure, and a monopoly of money, are the only ones situtated and capable of causing social problems big enough to require gigantic social correftive efforts in response...

in fact the status quo are the source, the cause of all social problems, which they pretend to fix, especially every time an election comes around, when deh shook the politicans at the people to promise all kinds of good things they never deliver

so they cause the problems and benefit, say they will solve the problems with wars on them, and profit even more....while the problems only get worse requiring more war. and with more war they profit increasingly on all sides of all issues, while the issues only get far worse in society..

so a war on terrorism is a war for terrorism, for they terrorists and the guy who starts a war on terrorism are the same, identical guys

the wicb is no different. when the wicb start its wars see the opposite of what they claim and then you will know what they actually mean by their programs... that they loudly claimed they started.

the magician focuses you on one hand of his, while he does what he wants with the other.

mapoui wrote:

BallOil wrote:Maps ..what is your take on this?

yu ever heard of the war on drugs, or the war on terrorism, the war on crime etc...

the only way to understand those wars is to approach them as the oposite of what those erms mean.

you have to operate this way Bally: when the status wuo speak they do so from a basis of exploitation. everythong they are, own, the social postion they occupy is based on exploitation and corruption, social manipulation and propaganda...outright lies/lying.... and can only be maintained the same way.

society has a a moral basis that is opposite to all this necessitating that all the status quoe does and must do to keep its ill-gotten social position is couched in terms of the principled moral basis of sociaty. therefore they must lie all the time, state and claim they are doing the opposite of what they actually do.

so if drugs are a problem and deh set up a war on drugs to solve the drug problem, it is in fact a war for drugs, for if drugs are a problem in the first place you can bet your bottom dollar it is they who caused it and proffited by causing it.

why again..becuase the staus quo through a monopoly of force, control of the social administrative aparaus, and a monopoly of money are the only ones situtated to cause any social problems big enough to require a war in response...

in fact the status quo are the source of all social problems which they pretend to fix, especially every time an election comes around

so they cause the problem and benefit, say they will solve the problem with a war on and profit more, while the problem only ges worsem requiring more war. and now they profit increasingly on all isdes while the situagets far worse for society..

so a war on terrorism is a war for terrorism for they terrorist and the guy who starts a war on it are the same.

the wicb is no different. when they start their wars see the opposite of what they calim and then you will know what they actually meant by their program... that they loudly claimed they started.

the magician focuses you on one hand while he does what he wnats with the other.

EXCELLENT post Mapoui! Man you getting better with age eh

last night I was watching Michael Moore's Capitalism: A Love Story... check it out when you get a chance.

where can I get it...fuh free! I will try the library tomorrow..see if they have it.

sorry for the typos. I was in a hurry and had to get ready to go out.

getting better with age! the peole mus' get up thats what. yu see my argument all along for spontaneous social uprising? look at the Arab worl, Iceland. the people without the need for any organising political party rise up and doing their thing

thats the best way forward. spontaneously if they succeed they will create new ways of doing the busness of society that is the way of the future. completely democratic ways. that is what the people always do.

the political paries interested in sectarion power have alwys been the counter-revolution. so to make the revolution without the party, keeping them out, breaking them up when they intrude and seek to led the revolution is the best way. deh not looking to lead deh looking to hijack the revolution

pay close attention to Mohammed El Baradei. he is the Imerican/Israeli/international banker sleeper in the mix. deh have sent him to Egypt to hijack the revolution. if he emerges as leader he will soon turn into another dictaor like Mubarak.

or if not he will set up a parliamentary situation, a 2-party electoral political system thorugh which Egypt can be controlled from outside by the traditinal manipulators