Home Conditions: Unfair advantage or true test of ability?
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:38 am
Whilst looking ahead to the forthcoming Natwest T20 games that England will host against the West Indies I happened to conjecture briefly on the potential impact that timing, overhead and atmospheric conditions could possibly have on the results of the games.
In similar vein I think we can add a few more factors e.g. the type of pitches that will be prepared and the type of ball that will be used. I want to take this opportunity to explore these matters and any others that contributors regard as falling into the same category under this topic. So here goes...
Reviewing the soon to be concluded England vs India series of games, it is quite apparent to me that on home soil England presents quite a formidable challange to any touring team! And I mean bloody formidable! Some of the games have been embarassingly one-sided - and India being the number-one cricketing nation to boot! Nor is Sri Lanka a shabby team but they too performed badly. And yes I know that both of these teams are in a rebuilding phase.
English bowlers seem to have mastered the art of what we hear them calling 'reverse swing'; and on their own grounds and in their local conditions this has proven lethal to all visiting teams this season! And although the pundits opinion is that in the Test matches Swann has not been as affective as they would have hoped, he hasn't really needed to be because the seamers have swept the opposition away.
So while one could specifically ask: "Does playing in England present the opposition with an unfair challenge?", it would be fairer, perhaps, to discuss the issue of 'home conditions' in a more general sense.
Admittedly one cannot dictate the weather but English playes - batsmen and bowlers - are more accustomed to adapting their game to climactic conditions; and a pitch can be prepared to suit the home team.
So what are your views on the topic of home conditions: Do they or can they represent an unfair advantage? or are they just another aspect of testing ability?
In similar vein I think we can add a few more factors e.g. the type of pitches that will be prepared and the type of ball that will be used. I want to take this opportunity to explore these matters and any others that contributors regard as falling into the same category under this topic. So here goes...
Reviewing the soon to be concluded England vs India series of games, it is quite apparent to me that on home soil England presents quite a formidable challange to any touring team! And I mean bloody formidable! Some of the games have been embarassingly one-sided - and India being the number-one cricketing nation to boot! Nor is Sri Lanka a shabby team but they too performed badly. And yes I know that both of these teams are in a rebuilding phase.
English bowlers seem to have mastered the art of what we hear them calling 'reverse swing'; and on their own grounds and in their local conditions this has proven lethal to all visiting teams this season! And although the pundits opinion is that in the Test matches Swann has not been as affective as they would have hoped, he hasn't really needed to be because the seamers have swept the opposition away.
So while one could specifically ask: "Does playing in England present the opposition with an unfair challenge?", it would be fairer, perhaps, to discuss the issue of 'home conditions' in a more general sense.
Admittedly one cannot dictate the weather but English playes - batsmen and bowlers - are more accustomed to adapting their game to climactic conditions; and a pitch can be prepared to suit the home team.
So what are your views on the topic of home conditions: Do they or can they represent an unfair advantage? or are they just another aspect of testing ability?