Page 1 of 1
is Benn and Shillingford the real deal?
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:44 pm
by BallOil
talk to meh
Re: is Benn and Shillingford the real deal?
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:24 am
by mapoui
I like shillingford. he seems very good indeed. I noted hm taking odles and odles of dung heap wickets and wondered why!
I like Benn too. they both have geat stamina and some ability at least. they are the best bowlers we have at the moment...as clear as day.
in the pace Roach of course but I am salivating over this Russell kid on the A team he is 22! were he hell was he all the time.
it looks to me that Taylor, Edwards and Rampaul are gone through. were I Gibson I would give Taylor and Rampaul both nice very longgggggggg time to rest-up! fit and durable young men with ability are those I would focus on. I woud rather play Sammy and David Benard before I went back to taylor and Rampaul
Re: is Benn and Shillingford the real deal?
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:29 am
by mapoui
by the same measurement I am had been looking at Kevin Kantarsing as well...another huge dung heap wicket-taker.
he too is a bit older, more experienced and that would help. why has been takin so many wckets? we shoul investigate
another slighly older player I am very keen on is Iman Khan. khan can bat and bowl very well indeed!
Re: is Benn and Shillingford the real deal?
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:26 am
by mikesiva
Benn and Shilly...the new Ram and Val.
Re: is Benn and Shillingford the real deal?
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:43 am
by BallOil
mikesiva wrote:Benn and Shilly...the new Ram and Val.
new something but doh think its Ram and Val. Look at those averages and SR eh
Re: is Benn and Shillingford the real deal?
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:21 am
by mapoui
BallOil wrote:mikesiva wrote:Benn and Shilly...the new Ram and Val.
new something but doh think its Ram and Val. Look at those averages and SR eh
in a bad side averages like Benns' is excellent! shilly is early yet but he has bowled real well n bad side in 3 tests
its like Bravo. this is a terrible side and Bravo has 80+ wickets and +2000 runs 10 35 tests or so.
these are all players would show far greater success if the team was a better one. these are players who need that kind of help
Re: is Benn and Shillingford the real deal?
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:30 am
by BallOil
mapoui wrote:BallOil wrote:mikesiva wrote:Benn and Shilly...the new Ram and Val.
new something but doh think its Ram and Val. Look at those averages and SR eh
in a bad side averages like Benns' is excellent! shilly is early yet but he has bowled real well n bad side in 3 tests
its like Bravo. this is a terrible side and Bravo has 80+ wickets and +2000 runs 10 35 tests or so.
these are all players would show far greater success if the team was a better one. these are players who need that kind of help
if this was a better team, do you think they would make it with those stats ?
Re: is Benn and Shillingford the real deal?
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:13 pm
by mapoui
oh yess!
remember that Benn have 15 tests and shilly 3 now. thats nutten!
yet in these last 3 tests they were 90% of westindies attack...our real attack...period! with all of 15 tests between them at the first test.
i was only by the end Roach was back to a threat...too late! itr was all shilly and Benn!
Re: is Benn and Shillingford the real deal?
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:21 pm
by BallOil
mapoui wrote:oh yess!
remember that Benn have 15 tests and shilly 3 now. thats nutten!
yet in these last 3 tests they were 90% of westindies attack...our real attack...period! with all of 15 tests between them at the first test.
i was only by the end Roach was back to a threat...too late! itr was all shilly and Benn!
If all WI players were fit, no way both would be playing... but yes they hold their own in this series.