switching on and off is acording to the article is what atherton reportedly said he did to focus. in follow- up, opinion and suggestion from chrisps as to what he would like to see from most athletes, what gives him pleasure, why he likes Bolt.
what anyone does to win is their own way of having themselves ready to do whatever they do in life.
Chrisps is unfair to athletes who do only what they have been taught to do..a function of who they are, where they are from, the discipline they have been subjected to all the way up.
Yohan Blake is also jamaican, is not really your un-smiling automaton getting ready to race.
Maybe Bolts 'fun' in preparation is a consequence of he being jamaican/caribbean where it is not unknow to laff in the face of the most serious of issues. yuh know..part of his preparation and disciline up to now that he has been through
we can be sure that all athletes do something to achieve their level of performance..and in preparaton to race.
in some cases we can observe a concurrence of preparation moves by many athletes..as Chrisps observed. and then there comes one who is different from the observed concurrence, who is way better, genious and unique in every way
we can be sure that he too is focused, ready to do excellently, fully prepared..but not in the way others appear to be ready, superfically observed.
what CLR James did was to speak to one such genius Headley.. at great length, to examine him as such, to discover what it was about him that allowed him to produce as he did. James found a unique individual and human being.
Chrips may do us all a favour by speaking at length with Bolt if he could... and to bring to bear on such a conversation as much analytic preparation as he can... to see more than even Bolt may see of himself, and be able to put into words.
chrisps wrote a nice article but it is purely subjective.
now if he speaks to bolt at length and gives us the results..that would be objective and much better than nice. it would be as accurate as one can get in such issues