The Kiwi Getting Good Again! Quickly!
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
momentarily maybe. but the Kiwi building a momentum of their own that will see them roll past west indies soonArnik wrote:It's more like Sri Lanka are not the POWERHOUSE they used to be.
But no doubt New Zealand look like they might help the West Indies in this test.
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
wats mystifying...Arnik wrote:Allyuh does draw some mystifying conclusions.mapoui wrote:momentarily maybe. but the Kiwi building a momentum of their own that will see them roll past west indies soon
there is always a momentum going..things are always flowing in one direction or another. existence is movement, and or being part of movement. all is motion...always moving.
the kiwi movement was decline, change, losing. now they are playing better against opposition that is stronger than west indies who just beat them.
the Kiwis also have a smarter attitude and approach to cricket than current west indies.
so wat is mystifying clear poster.
I look at the west indies and see a bunch of aging players and save in the fast bowling and Permaul, along with some spin prospects they are not developing properly..NO REPLACEMENTS OF ANY REAL WORTH.
I see a bad captain and coach, a rotten administration as well. so what is the conclusion
that west indies have actually peaked this year against minnows and are going nowhere fast. downards actually..while the Kiwi are trending up with at least one excellent young batsman n the mix.
west indies only have 2 retards in Lil Bravo and Barath who have real talent. Powell a very suspect quantity against top opposition..and very average and late twenties Fudaddin and Deonarine
wipe yuh glasses
- Arnik
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm
The logic does not add up. NZ doing well (so far) in this test against SL. SL stronger than WI. So the inevitable conclusion is that NZ is stronger or the equal of the WI. Dats some logic.mapoui wrote:wats mystifying...
the kiwi movement was decline, change, losing. now they are playing better against opposition that is stronger than west indies who just beat them.
If this same NZ side was to come back to the WI right now they would still get licks.
And when I last checked all of us on this planet aging so is not as if WI players getting older and players from other countries standing still.
-
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
keep on kleaning your glasses clear poster. you still not seeing. yuh certainly did not see what i said clearly.The logic does not add up. NZ doing well (so far) in this test against SL. SL stronger than WI. So the inevitable conclusion is that NZ is stronger or the equal of the WI. Dats some logic
the Kiwi are getting better. they are supposed to get better. they have a team of younger players. deh are getting better. deh are in a position to get better that west indies in a year or 2 not t this moment.
but the trend is clear.
and don't be selective with motion. all move...everything... disciplined by when they came in and the stage they are at relative to the time they are supposed to leave
- Arnik
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:20 pm
So what is the average age of the NZ team compared with the WI team?mapoui wrote:keep on kleaning your glasses clear poster. you still not seeing. yuh certainly did not see what i said clearly.
the Kiwi are getting better. they are supposed to get better. they have a team of younger players. deh are getting better. deh are in a position to get better that west indies in a year or 2 not t this moment.
but the trend is clear.
and don't be selective with motion. all move...everything... disciplined by when they came in and the stage they are at relative to the time they are supposed to leave
My glasses clear but yours has an anti-sammy-gibbo coating hence your claim bout NZ getting better and will beat WI in a year or two. I would not bank on WI winning in NZ but NZ not winning in the Caribbean.
Last edited by Arnik on Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:37 am, edited 1 time in total.