Bradman and Greatness
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:18 pm
I had relegated Bradman to a quality behind the top modern batsmen, noting that he had played 95% of his tests against England..and only a smattering against Indian the west indies and RSA...that he had not dealt with the exactions of travel and conditions the world over and the deleterious impact that has on skill and emotional strength.
yet it dawned on me recently that between 1928 and 1950 when west indies beat england in england for the first time..that england was the best team in the world..and that title devolved between the Oz and english all through those generations.
west indies, India which got test status in the late 1940', South Africa and Pakistan could not have and would not have beaten either of england and Oz in those days anyway...no matter where the games were played. there was a great quality disparity between the the Oz and english and the rest of the world.
also Bradman Played 52 tests matches and especially for those days that was a lot of matches.. he maintained his averages over 52 games.
so I cannot detract from his accepted quality on those grounds as I have before. I have given them back, re-registered Bradman as #1 but am still looking to pull him down but with more validity next time
yet it dawned on me recently that between 1928 and 1950 when west indies beat england in england for the first time..that england was the best team in the world..and that title devolved between the Oz and english all through those generations.
west indies, India which got test status in the late 1940', South Africa and Pakistan could not have and would not have beaten either of england and Oz in those days anyway...no matter where the games were played. there was a great quality disparity between the the Oz and english and the rest of the world.
also Bradman Played 52 tests matches and especially for those days that was a lot of matches.. he maintained his averages over 52 games.
so I cannot detract from his accepted quality on those grounds as I have before. I have given them back, re-registered Bradman as #1 but am still looking to pull him down but with more validity next time