When All the Players Are Available......?
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:36 am
I expect the immediate future of the westindies to be besy served by the removal of gayle from the captaincy...which should precipiate his unavailablity period foe Gayle is most likely to walk right aways from westindies cricket...which would not be a bad thing at all!
lets face it..Gayle has little more to offer westindies cricket. he is not scoring aymore, demonstrates little interest in playing for the westindies and his tactical approach leaves a whole lot to be desired.
the question is given Gayles attitude, if we can expect a more traditional, consistent and comprehensive approach by Gibson, to the problems westindies cricket faces, then Gayles 'unorthodoxy' has to go.
there is no way any intelligent, consistent plan can survive with Gayle in there. gayle is man of feeling and emotion, principle and ideas of manhood hat is pure machismo and parochial, narrowly nationalistic that would be more in tune with the samurai of long ago, that with the modern westindies.
it is time for gayle to go and for westindies to proceed with whatever organisational benefits Gibson brings.
one assumes that whatever Gibson brings would be better that that of Gayle who gave us resgination and and rescinding of, for the purpose of packing the side with jamaicans.
what can be more backward than that!
Gayle gave us many such small-mindedness and low level maliciousness, that with him one is always reminded of the malicious cut-up, back-stabbing, mauvis-lange comes', that is ordinary westindian life packed into the streets of westindian cities and markets.
that is not what we want or need in the running and administering of westindies cricket. it is not what we want in ordinary westindian life as well, which is why we struggle for development, the building up of the region that would yield a more experienced, developed and properous situation.
it was ridiculous to watch as gayle stood to the side deferring to John Dyson as Dyson led westindies cricket astray. Dysons mis-calculations cost westindies a match when we were on top..which precipitated a slide that allowed England to come back in the ODI series in question. as the miscalcualtions were made gayle was'nt even involved in the process, to determine if what was calculated was right or not.
Dyson had his way with Gayle even though it was always clear to me that Dysons loyalty to the westindies was always a question mark. it was clear to me that John Dyson was never in syn with westindian interest and managed westindies with an eye to the benefit of the white sides when we played against them.
Gayle is not a l;eader than ordinary westindian can count on to defend westindian cricket honour. Gayle does not even know what the term westindian means in cricket, so that his repsonse to bad decisions against jamaica in the regionals always elicited from him anti-westindian responses that were seriously out of whack with the place and time, out of whack with what Lloyd for example would have said in the same situation.
what we need in westindian cricket now is commitement, true westindianism that transcends Gayles parochialism and low level nonsense, real intelligence in administration, response and planning, with the true state of things in mind.
that is what we need, intelligence, competence that is pratical, innovative and pliable....not the dam nonsense that sees man of experience and achievement going to the batting crease 3 times in a row and getting out the same skunt way...over and over again...playing with a sense of petulance that says "I dont like you move out of it!
it is time to let Gayle go, as well as all his enablers like skunt Julian Hunte the biggest fool to be chair of the wicb.this game... I want to play ODI and T20!"
well piss off already! go pay the game you want! who the hell is holding you back! JUST GO! go do you damm thing and fofrget about everything else. the world will fill up any space you leave and go on, as soon as
lets face it..Gayle has little more to offer westindies cricket. he is not scoring aymore, demonstrates little interest in playing for the westindies and his tactical approach leaves a whole lot to be desired.
the question is given Gayles attitude, if we can expect a more traditional, consistent and comprehensive approach by Gibson, to the problems westindies cricket faces, then Gayles 'unorthodoxy' has to go.
there is no way any intelligent, consistent plan can survive with Gayle in there. gayle is man of feeling and emotion, principle and ideas of manhood hat is pure machismo and parochial, narrowly nationalistic that would be more in tune with the samurai of long ago, that with the modern westindies.
it is time for gayle to go and for westindies to proceed with whatever organisational benefits Gibson brings.
one assumes that whatever Gibson brings would be better that that of Gayle who gave us resgination and and rescinding of, for the purpose of packing the side with jamaicans.
what can be more backward than that!
Gayle gave us many such small-mindedness and low level maliciousness, that with him one is always reminded of the malicious cut-up, back-stabbing, mauvis-lange comes', that is ordinary westindian life packed into the streets of westindian cities and markets.
that is not what we want or need in the running and administering of westindies cricket. it is not what we want in ordinary westindian life as well, which is why we struggle for development, the building up of the region that would yield a more experienced, developed and properous situation.
it was ridiculous to watch as gayle stood to the side deferring to John Dyson as Dyson led westindies cricket astray. Dysons mis-calculations cost westindies a match when we were on top..which precipitated a slide that allowed England to come back in the ODI series in question. as the miscalcualtions were made gayle was'nt even involved in the process, to determine if what was calculated was right or not.
Dyson had his way with Gayle even though it was always clear to me that Dysons loyalty to the westindies was always a question mark. it was clear to me that John Dyson was never in syn with westindian interest and managed westindies with an eye to the benefit of the white sides when we played against them.
Gayle is not a l;eader than ordinary westindian can count on to defend westindian cricket honour. Gayle does not even know what the term westindian means in cricket, so that his repsonse to bad decisions against jamaica in the regionals always elicited from him anti-westindian responses that were seriously out of whack with the place and time, out of whack with what Lloyd for example would have said in the same situation.
what we need in westindian cricket now is commitement, true westindianism that transcends Gayles parochialism and low level nonsense, real intelligence in administration, response and planning, with the true state of things in mind.
that is what we need, intelligence, competence that is pratical, innovative and pliable....not the dam nonsense that sees man of experience and achievement going to the batting crease 3 times in a row and getting out the same skunt way...over and over again...playing with a sense of petulance that says "I dont like you move out of it!
it is time to let Gayle go, as well as all his enablers like skunt Julian Hunte the biggest fool to be chair of the wicb.this game... I want to play ODI and T20!"
well piss off already! go pay the game you want! who the hell is holding you back! JUST GO! go do you damm thing and fofrget about everything else. the world will fill up any space you leave and go on, as soon as